The environmental impact statement on the Keystone XL oil pipeline released Friday by the U.S. State Department delivered news that environmentalists will not be happy to hear. The study finds that the project will not exacerbate oil extraction.
By concluding that building the Keystone XL pipeline would not significantly "change the overall development of the [Alberta] oil sands", the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) released by the State Department on Friday removes a major obstacle to approval of the controversial pipeline. Essentially, the report concludes that, "[b]ecause of global demand, the oil will most likely get to market whether or not the pipeline is built," writes Coral Davenport. As Planetizen readers are likely aware, oil delivery by rail has accelerated in the absence of pipeline capacity.
"In a major speech on the environment last summer, Mr. Obama said that he would approve the pipeline only if it would not 'significantly exacerbate' the problem of carbon pollution. He said the pipeline’s net effects on the climate would be 'absolutely critical' to his decision," notes Davenport. "The conclusions of the report appear to indicate that the project has passed Mr. Obama’s climate criteria, an outcome expected to outrage environmentalists, who have rallied, protested, marched and been arrested in demonstrations around the country against the pipeline."
"The report released on Friday, however, is far from the final decision on the project," Davenport adds. The Departments of Defense, Justice, Interior, Commerce, Transportation, Energy and Homeland Security, and the Environmental Protection Agency will all have a chance to comment on the project.
Read the full story: Report May Ease Way to Approval of Keystone Pipeline
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority