A New York Times examination of the conditions of the city’s ubiquitous water tanks reveals unhealthy levels of E. coli and coliform—bellwethers for many varieties of disease-causing microorganisms.
Millions of residents in New York City rely on rooftop tanks to store and disburse water through the city’s high-rises. Surprisingly for such a high visibility figure of the cityscape, however, the water tanks attract very little attention from health inspectors or other regulators, according to the reportage of Ray Rivera, Frank G Runyeon, and Russ Buettner.
To reveal the lurking health risks presented by the city’s water towers, the New York Times took samples from water towers at 12 buildings in Manhattan, Queens and Brooklyn. The samples “found E. coli in five tanks, and coliform in those tanks and three more.”
The city insists that the city’s water storage systems are safe: “City health officials insist that the tanks are safe, and that the laws governing them are adequate,” and “health officials say no cases have ever been traced back to a water tank.”
“The thousands of tanks that dot the skyline are part of a water system that originates at 19 protected lakes and reservoirs in upstate New York…But the vast system of safeguards protecting the water supply virtually ends at the curb. From that point on, it is up to building owners to ensure that their tanks are cleaned, inspected and tested for bacteria annually, as required by the city’s building and health codes.”
However, the city does very little to ensure that building owners are protecting the health of those drinking the water held in their tanks. “The city’s own surveys suggest that nearly 60 percent of the owners do not comply…Building owners are not required to submit proof to the city that cleanings and inspections have been conducted, as they do for elevator and boiler inspections. Until recently, they did not have to provide evidence of the inspections to their tenants.”
Read the full story: Inside City’s Water Tanks, Layers of Neglect
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority