BART's Oakland Airport Connector will not look at all like the familiar cable car found across the Bay, but will be propelled by a moving cable similar to the Clay Street Hill RR in S.F. almost 140 years ago. The 3-mile ride to OAK will be 8 minutes.
Michael Cabanatuan, San Francisco Chronicle's transportation reporter, describes the 'back to the future' technology, progress, and background of the embattled "connector" from the Coliseum/Oakland Airport BART Station to Oakland International Airport (OAK).
"(I)t will be a modern cable car, using a motorized cable to pull automated and driver-less three-car trains between BART and the airport in eight minutes. Doppelmayr/Garaventa, a Swiss and Austrian company ('the world market leader in ropeway engineering' according to their website), designed and will operate the system. The firm has constructed similar "people mover" systems in (1999 between) Las Vegas casinos and (in 2006) at Pearson International Airport in Toronto and other locales around the world."
"By this time in 2014, people will be able to take the connector to Oakland airport", stated Luna Salaver, a BART spokeswoman (and only one year later than was reported here in 2009).
Construction is 65% complete for the system that will run on guidways that are elevated, at ground level and in subway.
While planned prior to the 1972 opening of BART, it was the passing of the Alameda County sales tax measure for transportation in 2000 that provided $89 million to the connector that proved instrumental.
Controversy and setback.
However, critics, notably the transportation advocacy group, TransForm, called the $500 million project a 'boondoggle', preferring improvement of the existing AirBus shuttle, and then the project "lost $70 million of federal money in 2010 when federal officials decided BART had not done enough to get comments from minority and low-income communities." Funding was sought elsewhere.
The AirBus charges $3 and takes about 20 minutes, depending on traffic. Ridership is 750,000.
"BART and airport officials project that 3.2 million passengers a year will pay between $4 and $6 each way to ride the Oakland Airport Connector", writes Cabanatuan.
Ridership apart, the high costs of airport connectors cause some analysts to question these investments.
Read the full story: BART to airport connector is on track
BART's Oakland Airport Connector Now in Service
Depending upon which Bay Area newspaper you read, the new 3.2-mile Oakland Airport connector, an elevated, driverless tram that takes eight minutes and costs $6, is either a huge success or a $484 million boondoggle. It began service on November 22.
Pricey AirTrain To Oakland Airport Proves Popular with Riders
The eight-minute elevated, driverless tram costs twice as much as the AirBus shuttle it replaced, which riders aren't happy about, but you wouldn't know it from the ridership numbers. The new connector service opened just over four months ago.
Trains Are Always Better than Buses, Right?
Josh Barro provide examples galore of why the answer to that question isn't always yes—where costly rail investment has been to the detriment of existing transit. His column targets proposed projects, such as New York's LaGuardia Airport AirTrain.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority