The Authority approved the $68 billion plan. Now the hard work begins in convincing the state legislature to sign off in order to capture the $3.5 billion allocated by the feds and begin construction from the Central Valley to the San Fernando Valley
The Mercury's Mike Rosenberg writes that the April 12, San Francisco meeting "carried little drama" because, as expected, the High Speed Rail Authority unanimously approved the revised $68 billion plan. The drama now switches to the legislature as they determine whether to authorize $2.3 billion of the $9.9 billion bond measure that voters supported in 2008.
"Compared with what voters approved in 2008, the new outline doubles the price tag to at least $68 billion, delays the start of service nearly a decade to 2029, slashes expected rider counts, increases fares, shortens the route and reduces train service."
However, it was clear that the prior $99 billion business plan that only connected Bakersfield to Fresno (137 miles) in the Central Valley would not pass the legislature.
"Also on Thursday, the board unanimously approved a deal to split with the Bay Area the $1.5 billion cost to electrify the Caltrain line after local agencies endorsed the partnership weeks ago. If the Legislature signs on, construction would begin soon, with electric Caltrains barreling between San Francisco and San Jose by the end of the decade and state bullet trains joining the line some 10 years later."
They also approved a previously supported (on March 1) Memorandum of Understanding with Southern California transportation agencies and MPOs to improve the Metrolink corridor which will be shared with High Speed Rail, similar to Caltrain in the Bay Area, though the $1 billion will not be used for electrification.
FULL STORY: High-speed rail board approves final plan for California bullet train
How Smaller Supermarkets Could Transform American Communities
Bigger is not always better.
Research Links Urban Design and Human Happiness
An emerging field of ‘neuroarchitectural’ research is revealing how building facades and urban design impact the human brain and body.
Save Lives on Our Roads Using the Safe System Approach
Prioritizing safety and committing to the SSA framework can make a big impact in the effort to reduce traffic fatalities.
Rising Temperatures and the Escalating Wildfire Crisis
Rising global temperatures driven by climate change are intensifying and prolonging wildfire seasons worldwide, necessitating improved forest management, public awareness, and urgent action to reduce fossil fuel emissions.
Looking Back on 60 Years of Land Development in the Twin Cities
In 1960, about 12 percent of the Twin Cities metro's land was already developed. By 2020, about 34 percent had been developed. Many factors influenced how the region has changed since 1960.
New Haven Reaches for Reinvention Amidst Failures of Urban Renewal
Seeking recovery from decades of failed urban renewal projects, New Haven rings in the new year by continuing a series of small-scale urban planning initiatives to reinvent its municipal spaces.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Oxford
Caltrans - District 7
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland
Newport County Development Council: Connect Greater Newport