California's Department of Transportation has resorted recently to forcing developers to pay impact fees to fund freeway projects, to the chagrin of developers, local governments, and taxpayer groups.
"Desperate to raise cash to make room for more cars on the freeways, California's main road-building agency is wielding an unexpected weapon: the state's environmental laws.
Using a law that says developers must mitigate the impact of their projects on highways, the agency is suing cities and builders for money to fund freeway expansion and other improvements that relieve congestion."
"Developers say the suits are extortion: Pay the state's ransom or see projects bogged down in litigation indefinitely. Local governments complain that the state is trying to grab funds that should be going to their streets and to enviro-friendly transportation projects."
"It is very apparent that these lawsuits have become nothing more than a fundraising source for Caltrans," said Rex Hime, executive director of the California Business Properties Assn.
"Caltrans is recognizing we need to be more strategic and smarter" about raising funds for freeways, said Gregg Albright, a planning official at the agency. "There just isn't enough of a revenue stream otherwise. The consequences of not doing this are significant."
"Albright said Caltrans has had the authority to force developers to pay impact fees for decades but has opted not to use a heavy hand. The agency slowly began to change its policy a few years ago and in recent months has become considerably more aggressive."
"The agency's push has drawn a backlash from building and taxpayer groups, who are lobbying Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to stop the lawsuits. They call the impact fees illegal taxes."
Ironically, the sites in contention include infill brownfields that may rely also on public transportation.
"Urban planners are reluctant to take sides.
"This is one of those troubling issues where both sides are right," said Richard Little, director of the Keston Institute for Infrastructure at USC."
Thanks to Patricia Matejcek via Sierra Club California Activists Forum
Read the full story: Caltrans using lawsuits to fund roads
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Brightline West’s future may rely on $6 billion federal loan
The company has until Nov. 2 to make a $400 million equity investment into its proposed high-speed rail line.
LA Metro’s ultimatum: no extra buses for LA28 if federal funding isn’t imminently secured
If Metro does not provide additional buses, LA28 organizers will have to find a new way to manage Olympic traffic. LA28’s budget does not include a line item for transit.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association