A new study highlights the complex challenge of addressing tree canopy disparities in South L.A., where historical environmental injustices, budget constraints, and competing community priorities hinder efforts to increase equitable tree coverage.

A recent study led by the University of Southern California (USC) and the South L.A. Tree Coalition highlights the complex challenge of increasing tree canopy in South Los Angeles, a region that has long faced environmental injustices. The study, “Rooted Connections,” reveals that while community leaders value trees for their cooling effects and public health benefits, they also face competing priorities like homelessness and gentrification, making the lack of trees more than just an environmental issue. With city budget cuts affecting urban forestry efforts, progress toward equitable tree distribution in underserved areas could be delayed.
As reported by Lila Seidman, the study also emphasizes the historical context behind the lack of trees in South L.A., citing discriminatory planning practices that have led to a disproportionate lack of greenery. Areas like South L.A. have tree canopies as low as 5 percent, compared to wealthier neighborhoods with significantly more coverage. Community leaders interviewed in the study pointed out the mental and physical health impacts of heat and the absence of natural spaces, as well as concerns about tree planting being associated with gentrification, signaling the need for intentional and community-led greening efforts.
Despite limited resources, efforts to improve canopy coverage are underway, with the Urban Forestry Division focusing on an equity-based approach to prioritize tree planting in high-need areas. However, achieving this goal requires more than just planting trees—it will necessitate a commitment to maintenance, partnerships with nonprofit groups, and adequate funding to ensure long-term success in addressing both environmental and social justice issues in South Los Angeles.
FULL STORY: ‘There is no easy fix’: Study reveals attitudes about lack of trees in South L.A.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions