A proposal to redevelop an area of South Madison with higher density and more housing options has drawn criticism from local residents who wanted to see more single-family housing included in the plan.
Despite calls by some residents to add more single-family homes to a South Madison redevelopment plan, Dean Mosiman reports that the Madison City Council approved the plan unanimously on Tuesday. The original plan, which aims to increase density near public transit and provide more housing options in South Madison, proposes 50 "cottage-style" homes, 54 single-family homes, 16 low- to medium-density units, and 120 units in multi-family buildings, while an alternative proposal "still envisions 50 cottage-style homes but increases the number of single-family homes to 65 on smaller, 3,000-square-foot lots, increases low- to medium-size residential units to 44, and doubles the number of units in mixed-use buildings to 240 while increasing the building height to eight stories." The proposed plan also includes expansion of a local park and transportation improvements.
A previous article by Mosiman describes the tensions between residents and city leaders who insist that encouraging denser construction is the only way to curtail the city's housing crisis. Opponents of the plan expressed concern about the 12-story height limit proposed for John Nolen Drive and displacement that could occur because of new development. According to Ald. Sheri Carter, "The vision is for more single-family housing, not creating a canyon effect on South Park Street, and increasing commercial spaces and business opportunities." But housing advocates say density does not have to prevent homeownership, and making housing more affordable will give more residents the opportunity to buy homes.
Read the full story: Madison City Council approves dynamic new blueprint for South Side
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects
The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
KFH Group Inc.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello