Forget red state versus blue state: a new data analysis and mapping project by The New York Times shows that the political divides in the country can be mapped to the neighborhood level within metropolitan areas.
Emily Badger, Kevin Quealy, and Josh Katz present an info-graphic-rich data journalism feature that reveals the partisan divides evident in the geography of the United States—in far greater detail than the red-blue and urban-rural divide that is already searingly rendered on so many elections maps. The big surprise of this exercise: the partisan dive of U.S. communities is visible at the local level, within urban areas.
"Democrats and Republicans live apart from each other, down to the neighborhood, to a degree that raises provocative questions about how closely lifestyle preferences have become aligned with politics and how even neighbors may influence one another," according to the article.
The analysis is made possible by analyzing the individual addresses for 180 million registered voters. The data reveals that "nearly all American voters live in communities where they are less likely to encounter people with opposing politics than we’d expect."
Maps of Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, and New York top the article, but the same patterns are visible in Atlanta, Baltimore, Austin, Indianapolis, Boston, Cincinnati, Charlotte, Detroit, Birmingham, Columbus, Denver, Houston, and more.
As for what explains these patterns, the article suggest that geographic alignment follows educational realignment,"with the changes concentrated in highly educated suburbs and more working-class towns and rural communities." Racial segregation also plays a factor in partisan clustering, according to the article. "African-American voters in particular are overwhelmingly Democratic and also residentially segregated (metro Milwaukee’s map of partisan segregation, for one, resembles its map of racial segregation)."
A lot more analysis on both cause and effect is included in the source article.
Read the full story: A Close-Up Picture of Partisan Segregation, Among 180 Million Voters
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority