Drivers for Uber and Lyft in San Francisco express their concerns and advice for self-driving taxi services.

In an interview for WIRED with 10 ride-hailing app drivers in San Francisco, Aarian Marshall and Caitlin Harrington gathered some advice to the newly minted robot drivers set to expand their presence on city streets. “Some was friendly, some not at all.”
For one, drivers say it’s sometimes necessary to ‘fudge’ the rules of the road, which robotaxis are programmed not to do (at least, not on purpose). “Rideshare passengers are spoiled,” said one driver. And having passengers run to the middle of the street to get picked up may not be safe. “When forced to choose between briefly blocking a driveway (technically a ticketable offense) and loading passengers in the middle of traffic, he’ll sometimes opt for the former.”
Drivers also wondered how autonomous cars will deal with situations when inebriated passengers soil the upholstery or fall asleep in the vehicle. “Cruise has a cleaning fee policy and charges up to $150 for ‘extensive liquid and smelly messes,’ including vomit. Waymo spokesperson Ilina says (human) workers use cameras inside the company's vehicles to determine if a cleaning is needed before or after rides, and that robotaxis are always cleaned when they return to home base for charging or maintenance.”
Other concerns include the unpredictability of city streets and the need for customer service. It remains to be seen if self-driving cars will be able to adapt to real city streets or if their limitations will render them less effective than human drivers. And while some drivers worry about the loss of income, others are looking for the next opportunity. “Some who know this is coming simply shrug—several ride-hail drivers told WIRED that they think the jobs have become too crappy to fight for, because earnings have declined over the years and there’s no reward for sticking around.”
FULL STORY: Uber and Lyft Drivers Have Some Advice for Autonomous Vehicles Set to Swarm the Streets

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)