A proposed transportation impact fee, years in the making, is stirring a controversy at a time of declining permitting and construction activity in the city of Seattle.

The Seattle City Council is considering transportation impact fees for development in the city.
Reporting for The Urbanist, Ryan Packer shares the background on a years-long process of exploring a new transportation impact fee, which has recently yielded a potential project list before the City Council for consideration.
Notably, Seattle has no existing impact fee—for transportation, fire protection, nor schools—like most cities in Washington State, according to Packer. Hence the cities ongoing efforts, dating back to 2014, to implement an impact fee.
There’s one big catch, however, to the idea of adding a charge on new residential or commercial construction to help fund infrastructure improvements: At the moment impact fees are under consideration by the City Council, “the City of Seattle is facing a revenue forecast that shows multifamily home construction slowing significantly, prompting the question of whether the timing is right to add yet another cost barrier onto the construction of new housing,” writes Packer.
The impact fee is currently held up by legal challenges to the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) required by the Washington State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA).
“Until that appeal is resolved (a hearing is now scheduled for late May), Seattle cannot move beyond the initial rate study for impact fees, which includes a potential ceiling for the fee. Only certain transportation projects are eligible to be funded by impact fees, and often only certain elements of those projects as well,” reports Packer.
Impact fees are frequently provoke opposition from developers and YIMBYs for creating another expense for development projects. A lot more detail about the politics and potential consequences of the proposed impact fee can be found at the link below.
FULL STORY: As Development Slows, Seattle Eyes Transportation Impact Fee Projects

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

How Atlanta Built 7,000 Housing Units in 3 Years
The city’s comprehensive, neighborhood-focused housing strategy focuses on identifying properties and land that can be repurposed for housing and encouraging development in underserved neighborhoods.

In Both Crashes and Crime, Public Transportation is Far Safer than Driving
Contrary to popular assumptions, public transportation has far lower crash and crime rates than automobile travel. For safer communities, improve and encourage transit travel.

Report: Zoning Reforms Should Complement Nashville’s Ambitious Transit Plan
Without reform, restrictive zoning codes will limit the impact of the city’s planned transit expansion and could exclude some of the residents who depend on transit the most.

Judge Orders Release of Frozen IRA, IIJA Funding
The decision is a victory for environmental groups who charged that freezing funds for critical infrastructure and disaster response programs caused “real and irreparable harm” to communities.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Jessamine County Fiscal Court
Caltrans
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service