Charging developers for improving local infrastructure impacted by their projects could boost transportation revenue, but permit applications in the city are slowing down.

he Seattle city council is once again weighing a proposal to institute transportation impact fees, which would impose a charge on new developments that would fund transportation improvements.
As Ryan Packer explains in The Urbanist, these fees are aimed at mitigating the impacts on local infrastructure and roads caused by new projects. “Transportation impact fees, a tool authorized by the state legislature as part of the Growth Management Act, are levied by more than 70 cities statewide but have never been used in Seattle.”
However, “the issue of adding additional fees on new housing during a well-identified affordability crisis is causing additional scrutiny of the idea.” The proposal is being appealed by a “shadowy group” called the Seattle Mobility Coalition, which claims that the city skimped on its environmental review of proposed development impact fees. As Packer notes, “an impact fee that discourages housing growth in Seattle, making sprawl more cost-competitive and drives up commute times would put more demand on the region’s transportation system overall, defeating the entire purpose of the impact fee program.”
Supporters of the fee see it as a replacement for revenue from the Move Seattle transportation levy, which expires next year. Meanwhile, development permit applications are slowing down, with a 62 percent decline in applications in the second quarter of 2023 from the previous year.
FULL STORY: Seattle Council Pushes Forward on Transportation Impact Fees

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Demise of Entertainment Industry Mirrors Demise of Housing in LA
Making movies has a lot in common with developing real estate: producers = developers; screenwriters = architects; directors = general contractors. The similarities are more than trivial. Both industries are now hurting in L.A.

How Public Spaces Exclude Teen Girls
Adolescent girls face unique challenges and concerns when navigating public spaces. We can design cities with their needs in mind.

Proposed Ohio Budget Preserves Housing Trust Fund
The Senate-approved budget also creates two new programs aimed at encouraging housing construction.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)