Transit Investments for Operations Would Make a World of Difference
In a movement that recalls, with substantive differences, the "fix it first" approach to automobile infrastructure, transit advocates are calling for a new attention by governments of all level to improving transit service as it exists, rather than solely spending scarce transit funds on capital investments.
An article and video (the latter shown above) by TransitCenter makes the case for investing in transit operations as a solution to climate change and racial inequality in the United States.
According to both the article and the video, "increasing the amount of service by 40% can dramatically expand access to good transit and bring many more jobs within reach of riders." The federal government, under new leadership, could assist in this effort by adding to funding pools for local transit operations. "Since the Reagan administration, however, the vast majority of federal transit funding has supported capital projects, not operations. That finally changed last year in response to the pandemic, with relief funding in the CARES Act providing a lifeline for agencies to keep buses and trains running."
At the Human Transit blog, transit planning consultant Jarrett Walker supplements these TransitCenter communications with his own take on the reprioritization of transit funding.
"If you want to transform public transit for the better in the US, there’s useful infrastructure you could build, but the quickest and most effective thing you could do is just run a lot more buses," writes Walker. Luckily there's a model available from country's neighbor to the north. According to Walker, the United States doesn't need to copy Europe, when Canada excels at attracting transit riders by running more transit service. Still, even the 40 percent increase targeted by Transit Center wouldn't bring the United States up to par with the Canadian example.