Shortly after Transportation secretary-nominee Pete Buttigieg told a Senate committee that all options were on the table to pay for federal transportation investment, a spokesperson ruled out a gas tax hike.
"Buttigieg, testifying before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee at his confirmation hearing to be secretary of Transportation, was pressed on a gas tax increase by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., one of several Republicans eager to put him on the record supporting a tax hike," reports Jessica Wehrman for Roll Call on January 21.
“Would you support gas tax increases, and if so, how much?” asked Scott.
“I think all options need to be on the table,” Buttigieg replied. “As you know, the gas tax has not been increased since 1993 and it’s never been pegged to inflation, and that is one of the reasons why the current state of the Highway Trust Fund is that there’s more going out than coming in.”
In response to a question from Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, "Buttigieg said it was 'possible' the federal government could raise the gas tax," adds Wehrman.
“Certainly many states have taken that step, including my own, but it’s not the only approach,” he said.
Apparently, that was the statement, merely mentioning the possibility of a gas tax increase, that prompted the walk-back.
A Buttigieg spokesman later walked that statement back, telling reporters that a "variety of options need to be on the table to ensure we can invest in our highways and create jobs, but increasing the gas tax is not among them."
Buttigieg could have noted that the Indiana 10-cent per gallon gas tax hike was approved on the last day of the 1997 legislative session by a Republican-controlled legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb. Unlike the federal gas tax, the legislation indexed fuel tax rates until July 1, 2024, capping the increase at one-cent-per-gallon, according to Planetizen.
Buttigieg could also have reminded the Utah senator about that his state legislature and governor agreed to a gas tax hike six years ago.
The editorial board of The Baltimore Sun expressed their disappointment with the new administration's position on the gas tax, particularly how it relates to Biden's much-touted plans to combat climate change.
It’s particularly unfortunate that President Biden has no appetite for the gas tax increase, because it’s also an effective tool in the battle against climate change. The plan he released Wednesday to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050 would surely be improved if Americans faced higher gasoline prices, given that the transportation sector accounts for more than one-quarter of emissions.
A look back
Biden earlier declared his presidency would not be “a third Obama term,” but in terms of transportation funding, there seems to be no change. Almost 12 years ago, just months after his confirmation, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood ruled out hiking the gas tax. The Biden administration acted even faster to calm gas tax critics that they wouldn't tamper with fuel prices.
As The Baltimore Sun editorial concluded, "A gas tax not only deserves to be on the table, it merits a prominent seat."
Related in Planetizen:
- Indiana Legislature Passes 10-Cents Fuel Tax Hike on Final Day of Session, April 28, 2017
-
LaHood Repeats Vow: No New Fuel Taxes & No VMT Fee, Aug 3, 2010
-
Obama Rejects Gas Tax, VMT Fee, Mar 11, 2009
Read the full story: Buttigieg cites gas tax hike at hearing, but aide walks it back
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority