By prioritizing a multi-modal approach and preserving existing vehicle space, the Seattle Department of Transportation risks abandoning the goals of its bicycle master plan.

The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) is defending the decision to eliminate planned bike lanes on 35th Ave NE, arguing that removing the dedicated bicycle space will allow for more efficient transit movement through the area. SDOT Director Sam Zimbabwe blamed "outdated" modal plans that don't "play nice" with each other. The agency is developing a new framework for resolving conflicts between modes, but it's unclear where and how bike infrastructure will be prioritized.
So far, the proposed policy prioritizes pedestrians in "urban centers and villages," transit between neighborhoods, and goods movement in industrial centers. The bicycle network will receive priority "at critical connections" where it will "share priority with pedestrians," signaling support for multi-use paths and trails rather than dedicated bike lanes.
"From what I have seen, it’s mostly a way of preserving the status quo," said Anna Zivarts, a pedestrian advisory board representative on SDOT's Policy and Operations Advisory Group (POAG). Bryce Kolton, a representative from POAG's transit advisory board, echoed similar concerns, citing a reluctance on the part of the city to redistribute street space away from single occupancy vehicles. "Until they can tell me why established plans have not been completed when they aren’t for car traffic … I don’t think a multi-multimodal plan is the answer."
Ryan Packer, writing for Seattle Bike Blog, acknowledges that there are still a lot of questions about how a more multi-modal transportation plan will affect bike infrastructure, but with almost no space reallocated from vehicles to bicycles, the "skeletal" policies proposed within the new framework seem to walk back the more ambitious goals of the past.
FULL STORY: The end of the Bicycle Master Plan as we know it?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

‘Quality Work, Fast’: NC Gears up for Homebuilding After Helene, Trying to Avoid Past Pitfalls
The state will field bids to demolish, repair and rebuild homes in the mountains. After struggles in eastern NC, officials aim to chart a different course.

Washington State’s Parking Reform Law Could Unlock ‘Countless’ Acres for New Housing
A law that limits how much parking cities can require for residential amd commercial developments could lead to a construction boom.

Wildlife Rebounds After the Eaton Fire
Following the devastation of the Eaton Fire, the return of wildlife and the regrowth of native plants are offering powerful signs of resilience and renewal.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions