By prioritizing a multi-modal approach and preserving existing vehicle space, the Seattle Department of Transportation risks abandoning the goals of its bicycle master plan.

The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) is defending the decision to eliminate planned bike lanes on 35th Ave NE, arguing that removing the dedicated bicycle space will allow for more efficient transit movement through the area. SDOT Director Sam Zimbabwe blamed "outdated" modal plans that don't "play nice" with each other. The agency is developing a new framework for resolving conflicts between modes, but it's unclear where and how bike infrastructure will be prioritized.
So far, the proposed policy prioritizes pedestrians in "urban centers and villages," transit between neighborhoods, and goods movement in industrial centers. The bicycle network will receive priority "at critical connections" where it will "share priority with pedestrians," signaling support for multi-use paths and trails rather than dedicated bike lanes.
"From what I have seen, it’s mostly a way of preserving the status quo," said Anna Zivarts, a pedestrian advisory board representative on SDOT's Policy and Operations Advisory Group (POAG). Bryce Kolton, a representative from POAG's transit advisory board, echoed similar concerns, citing a reluctance on the part of the city to redistribute street space away from single occupancy vehicles. "Until they can tell me why established plans have not been completed when they aren’t for car traffic … I don’t think a multi-multimodal plan is the answer."
Ryan Packer, writing for Seattle Bike Blog, acknowledges that there are still a lot of questions about how a more multi-modal transportation plan will affect bike infrastructure, but with almost no space reallocated from vehicles to bicycles, the "skeletal" policies proposed within the new framework seem to walk back the more ambitious goals of the past.
FULL STORY: The end of the Bicycle Master Plan as we know it?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs
The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.

Seattle's Plan for Adopting Driverless Cars
Equity, safety, accessibility and affordability are front of mind as the city prepares for robotaxis and other autonomous vehicles.

As Trump Phases Out FEMA, Is It Time to Flee the Floodplains?
With less federal funding available for disaster relief efforts, the need to relocate at-risk communities is more urgent than ever.

With Protected Lanes, 460% More People Commute by Bike
For those needing more ammo, more data proving what we already knew is here.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)