The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors recently closed outdoor dining because of a sudden but rapid rise of coronavirus infections in the county.

After the L.A. County Department of Health's order to shut down outdoor on-site dining facilities, restaurant owners and other food service workers want to know why their service is under fire while retail and gyms are allowed to stay open at a reduced capacity.
What data did the county Board of Supervisors consult when making this decision? Farley Elliott says that Los Angeles County, despite having a "fairly robust" contract-tracing program, has gathered data that are far from exhaustive and clean. The County has faced great difficulty in tracking cases with "10 million inhabitants, 31,000 restaurants, few mechanisms currently in place to limit individual travel, and no mandate to collect customer data at restaurants or points of retail," writes Elliott.
According to county officials, it is estimated that up to 15% of COVID cases can be traced to "dining experience," Elliott reports. UCLA associate professor of community health sciences and epidemiology Shira Shafir indicates that according to the contact tracking data, outdoor dining could contribute to the spread of the virus. Officials point to risk in any activity that requires people to gather, and especially those that require the removal of face coverings.
Elliot says that the county Board of Supervisors' decision to close outdoor dining has nothing to do with the causal data connecting specific activities to the spread of the virus. "Simply put, county officials agreed to shut down outdoor dining because coronavirus cases and hospitalizations have been rising dramatically over several weeks, and reducing the number of places where people gather — especially unmasked — is one of the levers of power available to them," opines Elliot.
FULL STORY: Where Is the Data to Support Closing Outdoor Dining in LA? It’s Complicated

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

USGS Water Science Centers Targeted for Closure
If their work is suspended, states could lose a valuable resource for monitoring, understanding, and managing water resources.

Congress Moves to End Reconnecting Communities and Related Grants
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee moved to rescind funding for the Neighborhood Equity and Access program, which funds highway removals, freeway caps, transit projects, pedestrian infrastructure, and more.

Integrating Human Rights Into Energy and Extractive Sector Transitions
Why just transition efforts must move beyond economic considerations by embedding human rights principles into business practices to ensure equitable, transparent, and accountable outcomes for affected communities and workers.

Blocked, Restored, Blocked Again — Housing Funds in Legal Limbo
Since Trump took office, the administration has blocked multiple affordable housing funding streams. Here's a look at which funds have been frozen, which have been reinstated, and which are in the courts.

Mapping Groundwater Risks from Orphan Wells Across U.S. Aquifers
A new USGS study reveals that more than half of the nation’s documented orphan wells lie within aquifers supplying the vast majority of U.S. groundwater, posing widespread risks of contamination from aging, unplugged infrastructure.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Moorpark
City of Tustin
Tyler Technologies
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions