Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
California Takes Step Toward Replacing Gas with Electricity in Buildings
"The billion dollars spent annually on energy efficiency in California is now also open to technologies that will help customers switch from gas to electricity for such uses as space heating and hot water," writes senior scientist Merrian Borgeson for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) about a unanimous vote by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) at their August 1 meeting to change a 27-year-old regulation.
Thursday's rule change [pdf] was the culmination of a motion [pdf] made by NRDC, the Sierra Club, and what is now the California Efficiency + Demand Management Council, in June 2017, to review and modify what is known as the 'three-prong test' which essentially served "to avoid encouraging programs that substitute electricity for natural gas," writes Robert Walton for Utility Dive (source article). The prongs refer to metrics for BTU consumption, resource costs, and environmental impact.
The change "unlocks an amount of funding that has the potential to really transform the marketplace for energy efficient appliances," Sierra Club Regional Campaign Manager Evan Gillespie told Utility Dive.
"There are at least 30 years of policy and regulations that have been built out to prefer gas. ... For building electrification to succeed, it has to cut through an enormous amount of regulatory bias that disadvantages heat pumps and other appliances."
Why the tight restrictions to guard against fuel substitution?
Coal was a major source of California's electricity generation decades ago. Since natural gas is cleaner, it made sense to guard against switching to more polluting power sources. "But this no longer makes any sense today," wrote Rachel Golden.
We now have super-efficient electric appliances like “heat pumps” that use 3-4 times less energy than conventional heaters, and can be powered by rooftop solar or the state’s increasingly low-carbon grid.
According to Senate Bill 100, in just over 10 years, 60 percent of the state's electrical generation must be from carbon-free sources, and be net zero by 2045.
The rule change shouldn't be confused with the unprecedented action taken by the Berkeley City Council on July 16 to ban natural gas infrastructure in most new buildings, aimed at achieving building electrification or decarbonization. The CPUC decision merely allows energy efficiency funds to be spent on new technologies powered by electricity.
Buildings now accounting for the state's second-highest source of greenhouse gas emissions after transportation. Borgeson writes that "building electrification using efficient space and water heating technologies that are commercially available today presents the lowest-cost and lowest-risk pathway for buildings to contribute to the state’s decarbonization goals."
Not all were pleased with the commission's action, though. Southern California Gas (SoCal Gas), the nation's largest gas distribution company said the new rules will "remove or reduce ratepayer protections" and obscure the real cost of some efficiency efforts, adds Walton.
Related in Planetizen:
Hat tip to Jim Stewart.
- Government / Politics
- Building Electrification
- building energy efficiency
- Energy Efficiency
- Fuel Substitution
- Fuel Switching
- heat pumps
- SB 100
- California Efficiency + Demand Management Council
- California Public Utilities Commission
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- Sierra Club
- Southern California Gas Company
- Merrian Borgeson
- Evan Gillespie
- Rachel Golden
- Robert Walton