Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Puget Sound Travel Survey Highlights What's Influencing Region’s Travelers

The 2017 survey shows that most people drive, but income and housing location also affect people’s options and choices.
April 28, 2019, 11am PDT | Camille Fink
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
Oran Viriyincy

Stephen Fesler reports on the Puget Sound Regional Council’s release of its 2017 household travel survey data. The survey gathered information on travel behavior, parking and transit costs, and the factors related to mode choice.

It finds that most people, over 80 percent, have free parking at work, and high-income workers have more access to subsidized transit passes. “Larger employers–which tend to be higher paying–are required to create a [Commute Trip Reduction] program for employees. These programs often include subsidized or free transit passes. However, that often leaves lower-income individuals without cheaper transit options unless they qualify for ORCA LIFT, a reduced fare program that King County launched in 2015,” writes Fesler. In addition, the majority of transit users are reaching transit on foot.

Most people across all income levels drive, but lower-income households are more likely to walk or use transit, the survey shows. Fesler describes the mode choice differences by race:

Asians had the highest drive-alone and biking rates while reporting lower shared driving trips. Black, Latino, and other multiracial households reported double the transit rate, substantially lower drive-alone rates, and higher shared driving trips. Caucasian households had the lowest transit use rates, but otherwise were middle of the pack for other modes.

The survey also examines the ways in which housing affects mode choice. People living in Seattle’s regional growth centers—higher density, mixed-use areas—are more likely to walk or use transit and less likely to drive than people living in centers outside of Seattle or those not living in centers.

In addition, most of the lower-income respondents report that living in a walkable area near activities is important to them. “This was increasingly less important to middle-income and higher-income households. It seems very likely that this is related to regular access to a car, which very low-income households generally lack,” notes Fesler. A similar income pattern emerged in terms of the importance of close transit, with a majority of low-income respondents indicating this was important.

Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, April 16, 2019 in The Urbanist
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email