Oil and Gas Industry Lobbyists Promote Carbon Tax

A political action committee representing the energy industry, including fossil fuels, has been formed by two former U.S. senators, a Republican and Democrat, to advance a carbon fee-and-dividend plan on Capitol Hill.

3 minute read

June 26, 2018, 7:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Christopher Halloran / Shutterstock

"Former Sens. Trent Lott (R) of Mississippi and John Breaux (D) of Louisiana, longtime lobbyists and two of big oil’s most devoted servants, have formed Americans for Carbon Dividends (AFCD), a political action committee dedicated to the passage of a carbon tax," reports David Roberts, who writes on energy and climate change for Vox, on June 23.

AFCD is educating the public about, and lobbying for, a policy called carbon tax-and-dividendMore specifically, it is pushing a proposal that was released last year by a nonprofit called the Climate Leadership Council (CLC), led by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III. AFCD is effectively the lobbying arm of the CLC.

The tax, technically a carbon fee-and-dividend, is similar to the 2016 unsuccessful Washington state initiative in the sense this it is revenue neutral, with revenue being returned to residents, as opposed to being used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as California's cap-and-trade program does. See the four pillars of the carbon dividend plan.

Planetizen post on the release of the proposal in February 2017 notes the trade-off of environmental regulations for the carbon fee:

"The Baker proposal would substitute the carbon tax for the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan," according to John Schwartz [of The New York Times] in offering more details on the proposal. "At an initial price of $40 per ton of carbon dioxide produced, the tax would raise an estimated $200 billion to $300 billion a year, with the rate scheduled to rise over time."

"So far, funders include Exelon, the operator of America’s largest nuclear fleet, First Solar, and the American Wind Energy Association," adds Roberts. "Four big oil companies, Exxon Mobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and Total SA supported the CLC proposal and are said to be mulling donations to AFCD."

While companies from the oil, gas, nuclear, and renewable sectors of the energy field have endorsed the effort, there is one conspicuous absence: coal.

 Under any economy-wide carbon tax, it will be coal that’s hit first and hardest. And what’s bad for coal is good for natural gas, at least in the short-term.

While most climate hawks recognize the importance of placing a price on carbon emissions, two provisions in the CLC carbon fee-and-dividend proposal should give them some pause. 

First, EPA regulations meant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, like the Clean Power Plan, would be revoked, allegedly rendered unnecessary. (It’s unclear exactly which regulations are included.) And second, energy companies would be given immunity to climate-based lawsuits like several currently underway. 

Reporter's assessment

Depending on the reader's perspective, David Roberts, who previously wrote for the nonprofit environmental news outlet, Grist, either has a cynical or realistic view of the political venture.

This policy is not bipartisan in any meaningful sense, it is not likely to be political popular, it’s not all that great as policy to being with, and it is naive to see it as a gambit that arises primarily, or even tangentially, from environmental concerns. It is first and foremost a bid by oil and gas and nuclear to secure the gentlest and most predictable possible energy transition.

For more reading on this political development to promote a carbon fee-and-dividend, see:

Hat tip to Fred Heutte.

Saturday, June 23, 2018 in Vox

Aerial view of snowy single-family homes in suburban Long Island, New York

New York Governor Advances Housing Plan Amid Stiff Suburban Opposition

Governor Kathy Hochul’s ambitious proposal to create more housing has once again run into a brick wall of opposition in New York’s enormous suburbs, especially on Long Island. This year, however, the wall may have some cracks.

March 20, 2023 - Mark H. McNulty

Empty parking garage at night with yellow lines marking spots and fluorescent lighting

Rethinking the Role of Parking in the American City

In cities big and small, the tide is turning against sprawling parking lots, car-centric development, and minimum parking mandates.

March 16, 2023 - The New York Times

A futuristic version of New York City, with plants growing neatly on top of modern skycrapers.

Friday Eye Candy: 20 AI-Generated Cityscapes

AI-generated images are creating new landscapes and cityscapes, capable of inspiring awe or fear.

March 17, 2023 - Chris Steins via Medium

Minneapolis Stone Arch Bridge

Panel: Minneapolis Zoning Updates Should Reflect Mixed-Use Future

A discussion of post-pandemic changes in work and commuting concluded that the city’s overhaul of its zoning code should be less restrictive with land uses.

30 minutes ago - MinnPost

Bike Light

People on Bikes Outnumber Drivers in the City of London

The City of London’s efforts to increase biking and reduce driving has finally achieved a long-term goal: a preference for biking over driving.

1 hour ago - Forbes

Aerial view of farmers' market with white booths in downtown Boise, Idaho

Planners Look to ‘Activity Centers’ for Sustainable Development

Existing hubs of ‘hyperlocal’ economic activity provide a model for urban density.

March 23 - Smart Cities Dive

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

HUD’s 2023 Innovative Housing Showcase

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.