Trial Over San Francisco Waterfront Development Height Limits Begins

The State Lands Commission filed suit shortly after San Francisco voters approved Prop. B in June 2014, requiring waterfront developments exceeding height limits to obtain voter approval rather than go through the Planning Commission process.

3 minute read

January 15, 2018, 8:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid

The Embarcadero

MightyPix / Shutterstock

Barely a month after San Francisco voters overwhelmingly approved a citizens' ballot box zoning initiative known as Proposition B that empowered voters on waterfront developments, the State Lands Commision, which manages public lands in the state, including the waterfront, filed suit, "arguing that the lands belong to the state and are managed by the Port Commission, not the city and its voters," reported Bob Egelko for the San Francisco Chronicle.

According to the Lands Commission suit, the shoreline consists of tidelands that California obtained as state property when it became a state in 1850. The state transferred the land to the city in a 1968 law that specified it would be managed by the autonomous Port Commission and not by city officials or voters, the suit said.

The trial began Wednesday, Jan. 10, reports Michael Barba, who covers planning for the San Francisco Examiner, and should run through Jan. 16, according to Deputy City Attorney Christine Van Aken with the City Attorney's office who is defending Prop. B. "San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos must now decide whether to invalidate Prop. B."

By forcing developers to gain approval at the polls, Joel Jacobs, a deputy attorney general with the California Department of Justice, said Prop. B makes projects more expensive for developers and as a result less lucrative for the San Francisco Port, which is charged with acting in the interests of California as the trustee of the waterfront.

Proposition B created a “flawed decision-making system” when it gave voters reign over waterfront height limits in 2014, said Jacobs.

Jon Golinger, a political consultant who has run campaigns against developments on the waterfront, took issue with that assertion.

“They are attempting to put the very notion that citizens in California have a right to govern themselves on trial,” he said.

Broader political implications?

At first glance, the litigation appears to be a strictly local matter, whether voters should have a say on waterfront development height limits. However, the Lands Commission is chaired by none other than Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, who is running this year to replace the termed-out Jerry Brown for governor.

"For Newsom, whose record usually wins praise from environmentalists, the court battle against the Sierra Club, which promoted Prop. B is awkward," reported Michael Finnegan, a Los Angeles Times politics writer, on May 19, 2017.

“I think it’s a stab in the back of the city he once governed,” said Becky Evans, chair of the chapter's San Francisco Group of the Sierra Club Bay Chapter, about the former San Francisco mayor.

The lawsuit has also opened Newsom to accusations that he disrespects one of California’s most cherished political customs: initiative and referendum.

However, Finnegan also notes that when the suit against San Francisco was filed in July 2014, State Treasurer John Chiang, one of Newsom’s rivals in the 2018 governor’s race, was chairman of the Lands Commission.

For more background on the proposition and lawsuit, see tag, "Prop B."

Thursday, January 11, 2018 in San Francisco Examiner

View of Mount Hood at golden hour with Happy Valley, Oregon homes in foreground.

Clackamas County Votes to Allow ADUs, Residential RVs

County officials hope the zoning changes will help boost the housing supply in the region.

June 18, 2024 - Mountain Times

Single-family homes in a suburban neighborhood in Florida.

New Florida Law Curbs HOA Power

The legislation seeks to cut down on ‘absurd’ citations for low-level violations.

June 16, 2024 - The Guardian

Aerial view of intersection in New York City with yellow cabs and zebra crosswalks.

Planners’ Complicity in Excessive Traffic Deaths

Professor Wes Marshall’s provocatively-titled new book, "Killed by a Traffic Engineer," has stimulated fierce debates. Are his criticisms justified? Let’s examine the degree that traffic engineers contribute to avoidable traffic deaths.

June 13, 2024 - Todd Litman

Digital drawing of person holding city skyline with wifi symbols and lines indicating smart cities or data.

Cities Awarded for Data-Driven Projects

The What Cities Works Certification recognizes cities for using data to solve real problems.

June 21 - Smart Cities Dive

The Basilica of St. Joseph in San Jose, California.

Faith-Based Housing Movement Grows

More churches and municipalities are saying ‘Yes in God’s Backyard.’

June 21 - Vox

Close-up of red and white BUS LANE sign painted in street lane.

Why BRT Can Benefit Cities More Than Rail

Bus rapid transit lines offer a less expensive, quicker-build alternative to rail that can bring other infrastructure improvements with it.

June 21 - Governing

City Planner I

Department of Housing and Community Development

City Planner II

Department of Housing and Community Development

City Planner Supervisor

Department of Housing and Community Development

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.