The lawsuit would not restrict heights—just the opposite. Back in June, San Francisco voters overwhelmingly backed Proposition B to restrict building heights along the waterfront. The State Lands Commission sued.
As noted here on June 4, 2014 after Proposition B passed with more than 59 percent of the vote, "(t)he measure will require voter approval for any new building on Port of San Francisco property to exceed existing height limits, which typically range from 40 to 80 feet but can be as low as zero and as high as 105 feet."
The following month, the (California) State Lands Commission sued to overturn the citizens' initiative, "arguing that the lands belong to the state and are managed by the Port Commission, not the city and its voters," as we then noted.
"According to the Lands Commission suit, the shoreline consists of tidelands that California obtained as state property when it became a state in 1850. The state transferred the land to the city in a 1968 law that specified it would be managed by the autonomous Port Commission and not by city officials or voters, the suit said."
On Wednesday, March 25, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos denied the city’s request that the lawsuit be thrown out," writes J.K. Dineen, San Francisco Chronicle Metro reporter. "Bolanos did dismiss one of the state’s claims, but allowed portions of the lawsuit to proceed." However, the height restrictions remain in effect while the case goes forward.
City Attorney Dennis Herrera said that he was pleased that the court dismissed the state’s claim that Prop. B conflicts with the City Charter.
This ruling upholds the power of San Francisco and its voters over building heights on the city’s waterfront, and is in keeping with over 45 years of land use regulation in San Francisco,” he said.
However, "Tim Colen, executive director of the San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, which supports the nullification of Prop. B," was pleased with Bolanos' ruling as well. The "ruling gives us optimism that Prop. B might not withstand legal scrutiny and may no longer be a barrier to building thousands of homes at all levels of affordability on San Francisco’s Port property," he said. [See press release.]
In 2007, the Lands Commission nullified plans of the Port of San Francisco because it had too much commercial development, reported SF Gate.
Hat tip to MTC Headlines.
FULL STORY: Judge lets suit to overturn SF waterfront height limits proceed
Trial Over San Francisco Waterfront Development Height Limits Begins
The State Lands Commission filed suit shortly after San Francisco voters approved Prop. B in June 2014, requiring waterfront developments exceeding height limits to obtain voter approval rather than go through the Planning Commission process.
Plan B: Port of San Francisco Moves Forward with New Land Use Plan
Voters might not want big changes along San Francisco's waterfront—but one powerful agent there, the Port of San Francisco, is examining new ways to do the business of building in the face of pressures from sea level rise and opposition politics.
State Lands Commission Sues to Overturn San Francisco's Prop B
Not so fast, San Francisco Prop B (the approved measure requiring voter approval for projects exceeding height limits along the waterfront). The State Lands Commission has a legal bone to pick.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
New Jersey’s second-largest city bans standalone data centers
Jersey City will continue to allow co-location facilities, such as those meant for research institutions that store their own data.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
Phoenix announces new on-demand transit service, more frequent RAPID buses
Both new services will launch in October, and are part of Phoenix's Project Effective Access Solutions for Easing Congestion.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association