Of the city’s newest, tallest building John King writes, “[it’s] as if the creators were so busy being tasteful they forgot that big buildings can be fun."

This week, the Salesforce Tower in San Francisco “quietly opened for business,” and John King, architecture critic for the San Francisco Chronicle, is only very mildly impressed.
“The 1,070-foot shaft, with its tapered form of metal and glass, is a well-tailored behemoth. Immense but understated. Overwhelming yet refined. A study in thick-walled minimalism that seems to hover more than soar.
All of which makes for a nuanced tower, conscientious and self-assured even as it reorients the skyline and redefines San Francisco’s visual image. But there’s also an air of detachment, as if the creators were so busy being tasteful they forgot that big buildings can be fun.”
In its many years under construction, the Salesforce Tower easily surpassed the height of San Francisco's now-second-tallest building, the TransAmerica Pyramid. That building was controversial in its own time but, as King previously wrote, has an iconic quality that is arguably lacking in the city's newest skyscraper.
One of a new crop of very tall buildings on the West Coast, naming rights to the Salesforce Tower—originally known as the Transbay Tower—were bought by a cloud-computing company that is a major employer in San Francisco and agreed to lease 36 of the available 61 floors.
The symbolism of a tech company looming over the entire city is not lost on observers, King has reported. And buildings of increasing heights have long been used to establish dominance in San Francisco, David Streitfeld recently wrote in The New York Times, adding of the Salesforce building, “The tower is not beautiful but is impossible to ignore.”
King reports similarly tempered comments from one of the principle architects, Cesar Pelli, who said of the tower that its was meant to be “very tall, very big, but still polite.’”
FULL STORY: Salesforce Tower - underwhelming despite its size

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)