How Overly Restrictive Land Use Regulations Hurt the Nation's Economy

Two economics professors from the University of Chicago and the University of California, Berkeley argue that the housing crisis doesn't just affect booming coastal cities. It's a national problem.

3 minute read

September 15, 2017, 8:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid

Highway Living

Tim Roberts Photography / Shutterstock

Sky-high housing costs stemming from excessive land use regulations, local no-growth activists, and in the Golden State, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are responsible for economic problems that transcend regional boundaries. So argue Chang-Tai Hsieha professor of economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, and Enrico Moretti, a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of The New Geography of Jobs.

When housing costs become prohibitive in booming cities, they impede the flow of workers from elsewhere, affecting the entire nation's workforce. Pointing to "increasingly restrictive land-use regulations," Hsieh and Moretti write:

Without these regulations, our research shows, the United States economy today would be 9 percent bigger — which would mean, for the average American worker, an additional $6,775 in annual income.

Hsieh and Moretti point to historic movements of workers in the United States as "the locomotive behind American prosperity."

Agricultural workers moved from the countryside to booming cities like Pittsburgh and Detroit. In the Great Migration, some six million African-Americans left the South for manufacturing jobs in cities like Chicago and Buffalo.

But as cities placed excessive restrictions on housing growth in the last 50 years, that movement has stalled for many Americans.

Since the 1970s, a property-rights revolution — what critics call Nimbyism, from “not in my back yard” — has significantly reduced the development of new housing stock, especially in cities where the economy is strongest.

Case in point: Silicon Valley. Residents in suburbs like Palo Alto and Menlo Park resist increased heights, density, and even affordable housing when put to a vote, as with a 2013 Palo Alto ballot measure on a mixed-income project that included affordable housing for seniors. "I think that all over the city people are distressed with the changes that have been happening as a result of high-density rezoning," No on Measure D campaign leader Cheryl Lilienstein told The Daily News at a celebration on the measure's defeat.

Neighboring Menlo Park hadn't passed a housing element for its general plan, as required by California law, since 1992. "From 1999 to 2007, it did not grant building permits for a single new unit of lower-income housing," according to the San Francisco nonprofit public interest law firm, Public Advocates, which sued them in May 2012. As a result of the settlement, the city of 32,000 people was the fastest-growing in the state last year.

And then there's the environmental law unique to California that impedes housing growth where it's needed the most. Hsieh and Moretti write:

The California Environmental Quality Act, for example, was written to protect green areas from pollution and degradation from large industrial projects, like new refineries or power plants. Its main effect today is making urban housing more expensive. It has added millions of dollars of extra costs to a sorely needed high-rise on an empty parking lot on Market Street in downtown San Francisco.

The solution, write the professors, is for "the federal government or state governments [to] keep municipalities from abusing land-use regulations to keep out newcomers." They point to California state Senator Scott Wiener's (D-San Francisco) bill, SB-35, which would "create a streamlined approval process for housing in cities that are not meeting their housing goals required by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment," according to the senator's press Aug. 29 press release. The bill needs to pass the legislature by today.

Hat tip to Peter Flieg.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017 in The New York Times - Opinion

View of Interstate 205 bridge over Columbia River with Mt. Hood in background.

The Unceremonious Death of a Freeway Expansion Project

The end of an Oregon freeway project didn't get much fanfare, but the victory is worth celebrating.

September 19, 2023 - Streetsblog USA

A derelict sign on a barbed wire fence reads “Golf Course, Private, No Admittance.”

Converting Golf Courses to Housing Never as Easy as the Market Would Like

Thousands of golf courses have closed in recent years, but the obvious redevelopment opportunity represented by many defunct courses isn’t always easy to realize.

September 19, 2023 - The Business Journals

Close-up of red Houston BCycle bike share bikes parked at a station

Houston To End Bike Share Program

Lacking the funding it needs to continue, Houston’s BCycle bike share system will end operations in the coming months.

September 18, 2023 - Houston Chronicle

Close-up of Unalakleet, Alaska on map.

FTA Announces Tribal Transit Program Grants

The agency awarded close to $10 million to 22 communities around the country for transit improvements.

1 hour ago - Mass Transit

View from inside glass top floor of Amtrak passenger train with Rocky Mountains scenery outside.

Making Colorado’s Front Range Rail a Reality

Local leaders are scrambling to bring together the funding and political support to create new intercity rail service in the fast-growing region.

2 hours ago - Governing

Students walking on sunny walkway on college campus.

How College Campuses Fulfill an Urbanist Dream

Most college campuses in the United States are inherently walkable, mixing various uses with diverse housing options and transit networks.

3 hours ago - The Daily

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.