Deland Chan, a lecturer in the Urban Studies program at Stanford University and co-founder of the Stanford Human Cities Initiative, makes the case for a bigger tent for planners and planning.

An article by Deland Chan suggests a new definition for the concept of "real planning" to ensure that women get more credit for the contributions to citymaking of the past, and that underrepresented groups have more of a role in the planning of the future.
For instance, Chan cites the work of "women-organized clubs that led the charge for urban beautification at the turn of the 20th century. " Plans like Charles Mulford Robinson’s General Plan for the Improvement of Colorado Springs (1912) erased the contributions of these clubs, in a familiar narrative about men consolidating and protecting their role in the making of history.
That example is a symptom of a larger problem, according to Chan—that the "planning canon, as it currently exists, reinforces a binary notion of what 'real' planning is and isn’t." While the ambitious plans, backed by institutional political and financing clout get credit, "planning from below, and 'soft,' people-centered work like community outreach, are not ascribed the same kind of value." Chan adds:
If we expanded the definition of planning, we might include Majora Carter’s workforce development and environmental justice work in the South Bronx, or Antionette Carroll’s Creative Reaction Lab, which tackles inequity in St. Louis. Carter, Carroll, and many other women leaders are not “real” (i.e. professionally trained and certified) planners, but they have shaped their cities and amplified place-based work already happening in low-income communities of color.
Finally, Chan puts out a call to action to the academic programs around the country to take a leadership role in redefining the scope of what's considered real planning:
To start, colleges and universities that make up the pipeline of future planners should rethink what they teach. It is time to recognize that our shared identity as planners is based on privileging the contributions of certain individuals and groups over others. In specific terms, institutions can reshape curricula to include missing or marginalized voices.
FULL STORY: What Counts as 'Real' City Planning?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions