Voters in Santa Rosa, California rejected a measure that would have retained the rent and eviction control ordinance that the city council had approved lasted August. The referendum was placed on the ballot by the California Apartment Association.
Santa Rosa, the Bay Area's fifth largest city (pop: 174,000) and county seat of Sonoma County, held a special election on June 6 to determine whether to retain or reject the rent-and-eviction-control ordinance which the city council had approved on a 4-2 vote last August.
Measure C, which would have retained the rent stabilization ordinance, was rejected by 52.5 percent of voters.
After the council passed the ordinance last August, the "California Apartment Association responded with a signature-gathering effort to place the ordinance before Santa Rosa voters," according to the association. "After the referendum qualified, the City Council in January called for the special election."
"What’s unusual about Santa Rosa is that it’s not considered a major tech hub, where high-paying jobs are often blamed for skyrocketing rents and evictions," observes Kathleen Pender for the San Francisco Chronicle. "About 48 percent of the city’s households are renters."
In November, voters approved rent control in Mountain View (home to Google and Intuit), but turned it down in San Mateo and Burlingame. [Rent and eviction controls were on the November 2016 ballot in six Bay Area cities.].
Pacifica [San Mateo County] voters will decide in November whether to make permanent a temporary rent-control ordinance that its council passed 3-2.
Rents have been rising in this county on the northern edge of the nine-county Bay Area. "Joshua Howard, a senior vice president with the apartment association, said Santa Rosa has fallen much shorter than other Bay Area cities 'in permitting and getting built the housing units needed to sustain' its growing population," adds Pender.
FULL STORY: Rent control loses a battle in Santa Rosa, but war rages on
How Smaller Supermarkets Could Transform American Communities
Bigger is not always better.
Research Links Urban Design and Human Happiness
An emerging field of ‘neuroarchitectural’ research is revealing how building facades and urban design impact the human brain and body.
Save Lives on Our Roads Using the Safe System Approach
Prioritizing safety and committing to the SSA framework can make a big impact in the effort to reduce traffic fatalities.
Key Climate and Health Issues to Watch in 2025
The escalating health impacts of climate change, from extreme heat to sea level rise, highlight the urgent need for integrated medical education, proactive communication, and sustainable policy solutions to protect public health.
Rising Temperatures and the Escalating Wildfire Crisis
Rising global temperatures driven by climate change are intensifying and prolonging wildfire seasons worldwide, necessitating improved forest management, public awareness, and urgent action to reduce fossil fuel emissions.
Looking Back on 60 Years of Land Development in the Twin Cities
In 1960, about 12 percent of the Twin Cities metro's land was already developed. By 2020, about 34 percent had been developed. Many factors influenced how the region has changed since 1960.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Oxford
Caltrans - District 7
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland
Newport County Development Council: Connect Greater Newport