President Donald Trump teased the release of his promised $1 trillion infrastructure earlier this month. Here's how a collection of experts reacted to that prospect.

An article for Grist by Nathanael Johnson and Matt Graft surveys a collection of experts on how they would spend the $1 trillion promised by President Trump to fix the nation's infrastructure. According to Johnson and Graft, "just about all" of the surveyed experts "panned Trump's ideas," so the article expresses an awareness that Trump might be over promising on this issue.
The collection of experts includes Lynn Richards, president and CEO of the Congress for New Urbanism; Aaron Renn, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute; and Charles Marohn, founder and president of Strong Towns, among others.
In a separate article for CityLab, Anthony Flint provides a dispatch from the APA's National Conference in New York City, where Trump's expected infrastructure plans were "high on the agenda." Here, Flint also expresses reservations about the prospects for Trump's infrastructure plan by calling for a "stop-and-think moment." Flint's main concern: that rushing to build "shovel ready" projects will not allow for quality analysis of how projects will perform once they are built. Instead of "shovel ready", Flint suggests the following criteria:
A more cold-eyed approach fully considers the cost of funding, the length of the investment, and the duration of the benefits generated. Planners need to maximize benefits over the full lifecycle of any project, and be mindful of maintenance costs. Additionally, careful consideration should be given to what economists call non-pecuniary benefits and costs—those hard-to-measure ramifications.
Flint suggests more criteria, including resilience and sustainability, and points out some examples from the region and city surrounding the location of the APA's National Conference of how infrastructure projects can go wrong.
FULL STORY: How Trump could spend $1 trillion to fix America if he knew what he was doing

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Demise of Entertainment Industry Mirrors Demise of Housing in LA
Making movies has a lot in common with developing real estate: producers = developers; screenwriters = architects; directors = general contractors. The similarities are more than trivial. Both industries are now hurting in L.A.

How Public Spaces Exclude Teen Girls
Adolescent girls face unique challenges and concerns when navigating public spaces. We can design cities with their needs in mind.

Proposed Ohio Budget Preserves Housing Trust Fund
The Senate-approved budget also creates two new programs aimed at encouraging housing construction.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)