New York's 1916 zoning code would not have allowed 40 percent of buildings in Manhattan to be built today, according to a recent analysis. It also turns 100 on August 27 of this year.
"New York’s zoning code was the first in the country, meant to promote a healthier city, which was then filling with filthy tenements and office towers," write Quoctrung Bui, Matt A.V. Chaban, and Jeremy White for The New York Times' "Upshot."
That assessment is reinforced in the introduction of a May 20 Wall Street Journal book review, "In Praise of Urban Sprawl," regarding Joel Kotkin's The Human City: "The New York Times in 1898 spoke of 'densely crowded quarters' and 'inmates . . . huddled together in their cramped hutches like rabbits',” writes Shlomo Angel. Zoning codes sought to improve city living conditions without having to resort to the sprawl that Kotkin praises. [See book review of "The Human City" by Planetizen contributor, Josh Stephens.]
"Since it was approved in 1916, the ever-evolving, byzantine code has changed many times to suit the needs of a swollen metropolis," write Bui, Chaban, and White.
Just in March, the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio won approval for a vast citywide plan that would encourage sleeker, more affordable developments. As the zoning code enters its second century, it is worth considering the ways it has shaped the city; whether and where it is still working; and how it might be altered so the city can continue to grow without obliterating everything New Yorkers love about it.
The 40 percent finding comes from an analysis made by Quantierra, "a real estate firm that uses data to look for investment opportunities."
Many buildings in distinctive Manhattan neighborhoods like Chinatown, the Upper East Side and Washington Heights could not be erected now: Properties in those areas tend to cover too much of their lots (Washington Heights), have too much commercial space (Chinatown) or rise too high (the Upper East Side). Areas like Chelsea, Midtown and East Harlem, on the other hand, would look much as they do already.
“Look at the beautiful New York City neighborhoods we could never build again,” said Mr. Stephen Smith, a co-owner of Quantierra. “It’s ridiculous that we have these hundred-year-old buildings that everyone loves, and none of them ‘should’ be the way they are.”
The reporters describe the various attractive buildings, with photos, that predate the 1916 zoning code, and the reasons why city planners altered the zoning code to make those buildings illegal. They consider the downside of the ever-more restrictive zoning codes. Explore Manhattan on this interactive map by placing your browser over areas and see which of four reasons would prevent existing buildings from being constructed.
"In honor of the code’s 100th anniversary, the Municipal Art Society of New York has called on City Hall to consider overhauling the code in a way that would make it intelligible to all," write Bui, Chaban, and White. See related Planetizen post in 2011.
“To understand zoning, you have to have a law degree, it’s so convoluted and so dense,” Mike Ernst, director of planning at the civic group, said. “The whole process of how buildings get built these days is so confusing and opaque to people. There really should be more transparency, so people can have an understanding of what the future holds for their city.”
Read the full story: 40 Percent of the Buildings in Manhattan Could Not Be Built Today
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
Idaho may see an 18% drop in federal surface transit funding — the largest estimated cut in the US
Transit systems in rural communities are much more reliant on federal funding to provide their services.
How ‘post-disaster gentrification’ alters neighborhoods after natural calamities
After hurricanes, fires or other calamities, the original residents of a community are often replaced by younger, wealthier residents.
Maryland local governments examine if they should have more power to raise property taxes
Maryland’s housing market is out of reach for the majority of moderate-income residents.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
KFH Group Inc.
Greater Baltimore Committee
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello