As excitement around the L.A. River revitalization heats up, neighbors of the once-neglected channel wonder who will benefit from the billion-dollar redevelopment.
Even partial restoration of the Los Angeles River has been promised to yield a bounty of benefits in the areas of public health, water conservation, and urban placemaking. But a piece in The Nation suggests that communities who lived near the channel through its less glamorous days may never reap those benefits.
The article explores what it calls "the striking alignments of interest among the mayor, the River Corp., and the city's power elite with regard to the project," noting the seeming conflicts of interest in the non-profit implementing the restoration plan, as well what looks like city cooperation with wealthy developers in buying, selling, and rezoning properties in the increasingly desirable area:
"[T]he fear of many current residents [is] that because real-estate interests have been free to speculate and exert influence without adequate public oversight, the very people who fought for open spaces in their neighborhoods along the river—among the least wealthy and least healthy in LA, and with the fewest public parks—may not be able to afford to stick around long enough to enjoy them."
Is there any chance that the influx of money around the river will reach existing river communities? Perhaps: The city has considered designating the area as a new type of district, where tax revenues would be dedicated to infrastructure improvements and community-based projects.
Community faith in the river's coming "rebirth" hardly improved with the news that architect Frank Gehry would conduct the restoration. Some viewed that decision—which wasn’t made public for nearly a year—as a betrayal to years of community work; activist Lewis MacAdams called it "the epitome of wrong-ended planning."
Kreitner's piece weaves these threads into a suggestive narrative that places fears surrounding the river project in the context of other casualties of L.A.'s relentless march toward progress—Chavez Ravine, Chinatown, Bunker Hill—and employs an informative cast ranging from local leaders and community members to St. Francis of Assisi and Mary Pickford.
Read the full story: Will the Los Angeles River Become a Playground for the Rich?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority