With redevelopment funding no longer an option, South San Francisco and other cities increasingly are looking to a community benefits platform, according to Murtaza Baxamusa, a planner and urban planning professor.
The demise of redevelopment has forced cash-strapped cites statewide to come up with more innovative ways to fund projects, with one such strategy involves granting development rights to developers in exchange for providing or funding public benefits.
A fine example of this is South San Francisco, which went through a two-year planning process to come up with a 20-year development plan for downtown that propose 2,400 residential units and 800,000 square feet of commercial and retail space within walking distance of the CalTrain station, writes Murtaza Baxamusa, a planner who develops affordable housing for the San Diego Building Trades Family Housing Corporation and teaches urban planning at the University of Southern California.
Labor, environmental, health, transportation, social justice, and housing organizations in the community came together to give input in the plan, which the South San Francisco City Council adopted earlier this year. While the community benefits approach to planning can be a tough sell in some communities, it’s one that has tremendous value, according to Baxamusa.
”Public accountability for public resources seems like common sense, but is often under attack. This is because a community benefits approach threatens the dominant paradigm in many cities: that of value-free growth (i.e. any development is good). However, a conditional acceptance of growth is not anti-growth, but an affirmation of value-added growth (i.e. any development ought to be good). It expresses astute stewardship of public resources by an educated public that recognizes the economic trade-offs between growth and stagnation, externalization and internalization of costs and benefits, and rent-seeking landlords.”
Other cities are taking notice. Redwood City, San Diego, Menlo Park, and Berkeley all have a growing community benefits movement, he writes.
FULL STORY: How Communities can Benefit from Private Development in California

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions