The California Supreme Court gave a green light to the state's embattled High Speed Rail Authority to begin issuing $8.6 billion in voter-approved bonds by rejecting the appeal by Central Valley opponents of the project.
"The California Supreme Court on Wednesday (October 15) refused to review a key case regarding funding for the bullet train, eliminating one of the project's biggest legal hurdles and allowing construction to begin," writes Jessica Calefati of the Bay Area News Group.
"This decision removes the cloud regarding allegations that we weren't doing things properly," said Jeff Morales, the rail authority's CEO. "It means we can go out and sell the bonds and get this system built."
"Kings County and two landowners filed an appeal last month challenging an appellate court decision in July that concluded that the authority basically met the requirements of a successful 2008 ballot proposition approving $9 billion in bonds for the project," writes Dan Weikel, transportation reporter of the Los Angeles Times.
For a quick, 52-second summary of the decision and implications, listen to Amy Quinton of Capital Public Radio news.
"Morales said Wednesday's decision means the pace of other construction work required before tracks are built will speed up dramatically," writes Calefati. "And earlier this year, the Legislature agreed to a steady source of bullet train funding -- a portion of cap-and-trade revenues collected annually from the state's worst polluters."
At issue in the legal case was whether the rail authority followed a sweeping set of stringent rules for selling the bonds approved by voters in 2008 to begin construction of the project, which state officials now estimate will cost $68 billion.
Not out of the legal woods yet.
"The project still faces other legal challenges, including questions about whether the train will be able to travel from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 2 hours 40 minutes, as called for in Prop. 1A," writes David Siders of the Sacramento Bee.
For rail watchers, Siders notes that "(c)rews this summer have been working on the first construction segment of the project, near Fresno, relocating utilities and demolishing, among other work."
FULL STORY: High-speed rail: California Supreme Court eliminates hurdle

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)