The California Supreme Court gave a green light to the state's embattled High Speed Rail Authority to begin issuing $8.6 billion in voter-approved bonds by rejecting the appeal by Central Valley opponents of the project.
"The California Supreme Court on Wednesday (October 15) refused to review a key case regarding funding for the bullet train, eliminating one of the project's biggest legal hurdles and allowing construction to begin," writes Jessica Calefati of the Bay Area News Group.
"This decision removes the cloud regarding allegations that we weren't doing things properly," said Jeff Morales, the rail authority's CEO. "It means we can go out and sell the bonds and get this system built."
"Kings County and two landowners filed an appeal last month challenging an appellate court decision in July that concluded that the authority basically met the requirements of a successful 2008 ballot proposition approving $9 billion in bonds for the project," writes Dan Weikel, transportation reporter of the Los Angeles Times.
For a quick, 52-second summary of the decision and implications, listen to Amy Quinton of Capital Public Radio news.
"Morales said Wednesday's decision means the pace of other construction work required before tracks are built will speed up dramatically," writes Calefati. "And earlier this year, the Legislature agreed to a steady source of bullet train funding -- a portion of cap-and-trade revenues collected annually from the state's worst polluters."
At issue in the legal case was whether the rail authority followed a sweeping set of stringent rules for selling the bonds approved by voters in 2008 to begin construction of the project, which state officials now estimate will cost $68 billion.
Not out of the legal woods yet.
"The project still faces other legal challenges, including questions about whether the train will be able to travel from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 2 hours 40 minutes, as called for in Prop. 1A," writes David Siders of the Sacramento Bee.
For rail watchers, Siders notes that "(c)rews this summer have been working on the first construction segment of the project, near Fresno, relocating utilities and demolishing, among other work."
Read the full story: High-speed rail: California Supreme Court eliminates hurdle
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority