That's the question facing the nation's largest environmental organization (not the Sierra Club but The Nature Conservancy) regarding the management of its preserve in Texas. There is no question for Naomi Klein, who writes about it in her new book.
(Updated 08-08-2014) "With more than $6 billion in assets, the conservancy is by far the largest environmental organization in the United States," writes Justin Gillis of The New York Times about the Texas City Prairie Preserve that "is supposed to be a refuge for the Attwater’s prairie chicken, one of the most critically endangered birds in North America."
Gas and oil were being produced on the Texas City property at the time the land was donated, but relatively far from the breeding grounds of the prairie chicken. In 1999, the Nature Conservancy’s Texas chapter decided to permit new drilling there, with the idea of dedicating the money to prairie chicken conservation. It sought out a deal with an energy company and a new well was drilled, about a half-mile from the primary breeding grounds.
Gillis provides a thorough chronology of the nonprofit's energy/conservation dilemma. "The drilling was exposed by The Los Angeles Times in 2002, and explored in more detail a year later by The Washington Post, in a series of articles that raised broad questions about the activities the Nature Conservancy was permitting on conservation lands. A two-year Senate investigation [PDF] sharply criticized the Nature Conservancy."
Which brings us to Naomi Klein's forthcoming book, "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate", to be released next month.
The Nature Conservancy "argues that it has had no choice" other than to permit drilling of a new well in 2007, writes Gillis, due to its original lease. "But the lease contains termination clauses, and Ms. Klein argues in the book that the Nature Conservancy could most likely have stopped the 2007 drilling. The group has earned millions of dollars over the years from gas and oil production on the property, though the 2007 well was not especially lucrative," adds Gillis.
Last word goes to the Attwaters Prairie-Chicken, and it is not a nice ending.
.jpg)
Credit: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Sadly, the endangered bird no longer graces the preserve - the property purchased for it. Gillis writes that "(t)he birds appear to have disappeared from the site, though it is unclear whether the drilling had anything to do with that. The Nature Conservancy contends it took exhaustive steps to protect the birds, which continue to exist in small numbers elsewhere in Texas."
One such place one may be able to see the rare bird is at the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge. The initial question asked in this post, "Can Conservation and Oil Drilling Coexist?" was answered by Terry Rossignol, Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge manager. "We do have oil and gas* facilities operating here since the property was first purchased," he stated in a phone call.
*The post was updated to more accurately describe the facilities in the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge.
Read the full story: Group Earns Oil Income Despite Pledge on Drilling
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority