Will a large city do what its county voters refused to do—fund the county bus system, though largely within city limits? Seattle voters will be put to the test in November when asked to pay an annual $60 vehicle fee and 0.1% sales tax.
Demography matters. Can a large, progressive city be pulled down by its more populous, conservative suburban neighbors? Essentially that's what happened in April with the defeat of Proposition 1 that reduced county bus service substantially. Seattle voters have been given the opportunity to save their bus transit come November.
"The Seattle City Council Thursday (July 17th) unanimously approved sending a funding package for (King County) Metro transit service to voters in November. The measure would levy a $60 car-tab fee and increase the city sales tax by 0.1 percent," writes Lynn Thompson, Seattle Times staff reporter.
As noted in April, 55% of King County voters rejected the same funding proposal known as Proposition 1, that is, a $60 "car tab" fee and .1% sales increase. The major difference between the county and city proposal is that tax revenues from the April county measure "would have been split 60 percent for transit and 40 percent for county and city roads."
"King County Executive Dow Constantine announced Wednesday (April 23) that, with the defeat of Proposition 1 in the special election, he will send legislation Thursday to the County Council to eliminate 72 Metro Transit bus routes and reduce service by 550,000 hours,..."
Seattle's November proposal will almost entirely fund transit: "$40 million a year for city transit, $3 million to support regional routes in partnership with other cities and $2 million to give low-income residents a $20 car-tab rebate," writes Thompson.
Interestingly, the city council debate on the measure centered on an "amendment...that would have replaced the sales-tax hike with increases to the city’s commercial parking tax and employee head tax, which (proponents) said were less regressive," adds Thompson.
In May, we noted that 66% of Seattle voters supported Proposition 1. The problem for Seattle, population 652,405, is that it represents 32% of the King County population of 2,044,449.
Read the full story: Seattle vote set on tax, bump in car-tab fee to save bus service
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority