Taxis v. Uber: A Regulatory Update
Are rideshare companies like Uber here to stay? The answer likely hinges on a series of legal battles taking place nationwide.
Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar are under attack from highly regulated taxi and cab companies. The friction has left cities and states struggling to find a balance between demand for rideshare services and the interests of the taxi industry, writes Amber Cortes.
The rideshare question is currently on the docket in Arizona and Colorado, where pending bills outline what kind of regulation Uber and like companies would (and wouldn’t) face. On a municipal level, Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Houston, and Seattle are all considering how to incorporate ridesharing into local transportation codes.
Published on Thursday, February 27, 2014 in
Topics
- The Scourge of Setbacks
- 'Plansplaining' and its Discontents
- Seattle's New Seawall: An Experiment in Climate Adaptation and Habitat Restoration
- YIMBYs Attacked from the (Far) Left
- A Change of Heart by Secretary Chao on California's Oldest Commuter Rail Line
- As Big Box Retailers Fade, New Uses Are Springing Up
- Friday Eye Candy: A Mobile App That Provides a Historic Window Into New York
- Op-Ed: The Shortcomings of Matthew Desmond's 'Evicted'
- Study: Transit Really Does Reduce Obesity
- The Sky's the Limit for Washington, D.C.-Area High Rises
- California Delta Tunnels Don't Stand Up to Federal Analysis
- Bad Science Linked to Fears of Fake Grass
- Reclaimed Garden Models New Economic Development Strategy
- New Center Integrates Land Use and Water Policy
- Steep Climb to Raising Louisiana's Gas Tax
- Black Chicagoans Segregated, Regardless of Income
- Nevada BLM Land to Stay in Federal Hands
- Flushing Drivers Out of the Bike Lane in Omaha
- Partnerships Drove Napa Flood Control Project
- Activating Artists as an Urban Resource
