Aslıgül Göçmen examines the environmental impact of conservation subdivision design.
“Assessing the Environmental Merits of Conservation Subdivision Design” by Z. Aslıgül Göçmen
Between those who extol the virtues of low-density suburban development (e.g. Kotkin, Cox, Gordon) and others who promote Smart Growth strategies (e.g. Talen, Ewing) lies the idea of the conservation subdivision. This policy strategy popularized by Arendt (1996) seeks to reconcile traditional suburban tract development with ecological principles.1 More specifically, conservation subdivision design should promote:“(1) protection of environmentally sensitive and ecologically significant areas within a subdivision, (2) creation of a regional network of such land and open spaces, and (3) less runoff and less pollution in the region’s water resources” (2). Environmental conservation is achieved mostly through the clustering of housing within the subdivision. Using 26 conservation developments paired with 26 traditional suburban developments in Waukesha County, Z. Asilgul Gocmen asks whether those designed as conservation subdivisions under county regulations deliver on their ecological promises and goals.
Building on existing literature, Gocmen analyses whether conservation subdivisions actually does lead to 1) land preservation, 2) a network of interconnected open space, and 3) water quality benefits (through reductions in impervious surfaces). By matching subdivisions by gross density, size, and location, Göçmen isolates the impact of the conservation design through comparison with similar conventional developments.
Several key indicators tested failed to show statistically significant correlations (See Table). That said, “conservation subdivisions protected significantly more land (50 percent) than did conventional subdivisions (11 percent). However, the proportion of land left natural versus mown in these open spaces was similar.” Interviews conducted by the author confirmed that developers and planners do not give formal consideration the ecological values of which open spaces are conserved. Instead, they try to guarantee that there is a minimum of land set-aside.
In terms of water, conservation subdivisions did not have wider riparian buffers and did not decrease impervious surfaces. They did, however, include better designed storm-water retention ponds.
While conservation subdivisions do represent some improvements, they do not as currently practiced in Wisconsin offer a greatly improved environmental model for development.
Given these findings, should planners ask if site-based strategies are appropriate for landscape-scale conservation goals?
SAGE and ACSP have kindly granted access to the full article until 1/21/2014
Follow JPER on Twitter @JPER7
Göçmen, Z. Aslıgül. 2013. Assessing the Environmental Merits of Conservation Subdivision Design.Journal of Planning Education and Research: 0739456X13512526.
Summary by Tom Douthat

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Walmart Announces Nationwide EV Charging Network
The company plans to install electric car chargers at most of its stores by 2030.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Lakewood Celebrates Arbor Day and Strengthens Urban Forestry Legacy
Lakewood celebrated Arbor Day and its 43rd year as a Tree City USA community with a youth-led tree planting event at O’Kane Park, reinforcing its long-standing commitment to urban forestry and environmental education.

NYC Congestion Pricing Continues to Show Positive Results
While the Trump administration attempts to revoke the program’s federal approval, congestion pricing continues to reduce traffic, speed up bus travel times, and improve air quality in Manhattan.

Grassroots Dutch Movement Replaces Pavement With Green Space
Neighbors engage in a practice known as “tegelwippen,” picking up paving stones and replacing them with permeable surfaces, often with the support of local governments.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Moorpark
City of Tustin
Tyler Technologies
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
