After suffering a major setback from a court decision that prevents the authority from selling $10 billion in voter-approved bonds, a key federal agency has ruled that the authority must comply with environmental regulations before laying tracks.
"In another key setback to the California bullet train project, federal regulators have rejected the state's request to exempt a large Central Valley segment of proposed track from a lengthy planning review," writes Ralph Vartabedian.
The action affects part of a 29-mile rail section to be built near Fresno, where state officials have already awarded a construction contract. The decision is likely to complicate, delay and substantially drive up the cost on that initial $1-billion package of work.
The rejection from the Surface Transportation Board, the successor agency to the Interstate Commerce Commission, "marks the second time in nine days that the rail agency's planning process has been rejected by authorities". As we noted on Nov. 26 a Sacramento Superior Court's "invalidation of the project's financing plan has put its future in doubt".
Related to that court ruling, Vartabedian writes that "the federal board's vice chairman Ann Begeman issued a statement calling for a comprehensive analysis of the project's "financial fitness." She added, "Today's decision acknowledges the growing controversy regarding California's bond funding process."
The ruling potentially affects the California High Speed Rail Authority's construction contract with Tutor Perini Corp. (and the topic of a prior post). However, "(a)n authority representative said there was no plan to renegotiate the contract... because it has until July 2014 to get the clearance from the board without renegotiating the deal."
The setback not only affects the authority, but also a broader goal: President Obama's "vision for high speed rail", the topic of a Dec. 5 piece by Sam Stein in The Huntington Post.
Read the full story: California bullet train project handed another setback
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Housing is the top priority of Seattle’s sole new councilmember
Jenks campaigned on building 1,000 new units of affordable housing.
New tax cuts may slash $1.5 billion in funding for Miami transit, public parks
Amendment 3 will save Miami-Dade homeowners $2,700 in 2028.
Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms
The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority