California's Alternative Energy Strategy, or Lack Thereof, Heads for a Reckoning

California has set a deadline of 2020 to rely less on fossil fuels and more on alternative energy, but a report finds this strategy could end up emptying ratepayers' pockets and damaging the state's environmental resources, reports Julie Cart.
December 7, 2012, 8am PST | Jessica Hsu
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

The increase of wind and solar sources to California's energy mix is intended to reduce the state's use of fossil fuels, in accordance with a legal requirement that state utilities must draw a third of their power from these renewable sources by 2020. The effort is applaudable, says nonpartisan Little Hoover Commission, but this plan could be a "profoundly expensive policy failure" due to the "balkanized" and "dysfunctional" network of state energy agencies. In its analysis "Rewiring California," the Commission warns that policy errors resulted in the crisis that raised electricity rates through the roof during former Governor Gray Davis's administration and that a similar problem could happen due to the current energy strategy, or lack thereof. Their recommendation for Governor Jerry Brown is "to establish a single overarching entity or agency to coordinate the state's energy policy."

"Getting it right is far more important than speed," said Commission Chairman David Hancock. "Without more careful calibration of these policies, Californians may wind up paying more than necessary for electricity and the state may unnecessarily degrade pristine habitat in its rush to implement renewable energy goals." Even though the energy initiative is a step towards the future, the Commission asks Brown "to assess the real cost of the state's energy policies and determine whether they will help achieve the goal of reducing fossil fuel emissions" and to consider "a moratorium on further renewable energy policies."

Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 in The Los Angeles Times
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email