Recent studies on older generations' dwelling and travel patterns show that urban areas may provide more mobility and independence than suburban areas with less access to public transit.
As the "silver tsunami" of Baby Boomers facing retirement begins to break, those born between 1946 and 1964 are starting to face the question of where to spend their golden years. Baby Boomers pride themselves for their generation's independent spirit, and they would prefer to maintain this status into old age. Marlys Harris writes that "boomers are adamant that they do not want to live the way elderly people have in the past. That was the message from John McIlwain, senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute in Washington, D.C. 'They think that they are different,' he said. 'They feel that they are entering a second stage of adulthood.'"
So far, studies have shown that boomers prefer to live in the comfort of suburban areas. "A 2009 MetLife Foundation study found that 62 percent of people aged 55 and over say they plan to stay in suburbia." However, Harris claims, moving to urban areas may prove more beneficial for seniors due to easier access to a variety of transit options.
Harris goes on to say that other studies have found that "people over age 65 who no longer drive make 15 percent fewer trips to the doctor, 59 percent fewer trips to shop or eat out and 65 percent fewer trips to socialize. Unable to get around, to buy groceries, make medical appointments, visit the bank and so on, boomers will, like it or not, be forced to move into that nursing home." In other words, giving up a home and a car in suburbia may not seem so bad compared to the alternative. Harris points out that public transit poses its own set of issues for the aging population, but it's a helpful factor to consider when the boomers begin sifting through the choices for where to spend the next chapter of their lives.
Read the full story: What's Better for Old People: City or Suburb?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority