Chris Williamson offers advice on how to make sure you don't confuse Census Bureau projections with actual planning.
"Last September, the Census Bureau released its American Community Survey estimates for cities, counties, and census-designated places with populations over 65,000. Most notable was the ACS's published margin of error, which allows the data user to construct the low-to-high error range of the estimate.
Technically, any number within the range is correct, but the popular press had a field day with that definition of "correct." Reporters found cities where the low end of the error range was below the city's current population and the high end of the range showed a dramatic increase.
...Keep in mind that a projection is a conditional statement about the future based on a set of assumptions. A projection is basically math run on a set of data and assumptions. In applied demography, the beginning year census data and math are seldom wrong. The real art is in choosing assumptions, which are often implied future planning decisions.
...Finally, think ahead. If communities create entitlements to accommodate projection-based growth for 10 or 20 years into the future, that growth is likely to occur. In other words, growth will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Isn't it irresponsible to ignore projections in planning? Yes, it is. What is the alternative? The alternative is old-fashioned planning that takes projections into account, but is not driven by projections. Suppose planners asked these questions: Can we have our vision in the context of these population projections? What will happen if we try? How much and what kind of projected demand should we accommodate to keep our economy healthy and to house our own children?
That is a very different paradigm from this one: "We must plan to accommodate [number] housing units over [years] based on the [source] projection."
Chris Williamson, AICP, is a senior planner in Oxnard, California, and adjunct associate professor of planning and GIS at the University of Southern California. He also teaches Planetizen's PLAN-120: Introduction to Census Data, ACS, and Growth course.
FULL STORY: Is That a Good Assumption?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.
Can We Please Give Communities the Design They Deserve?
Often an afterthought, graphic design impacts everything from how we navigate a city to how we feel about it. One designer argues: the people deserve better.
Engineers Gave America's Roads an Almost Failing Grade — Why Aren't We Fixing Them?
With over a trillion dollars spent on roads that are still falling apart, advocates propose a new “fix it first” framework.
The European Cities That Love E-Scooters — And Those That Don’t
Where they're working, where they're banned, and where they're just as annoying the tourists that use them.
Map: Where Senate Republicans Want to Sell Your Public Lands
For public land advocates, the Senate Republicans’ proposal to sell millions of acres of public land in the West is “the biggest fight of their careers.”
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Borough of Carlisle
Smith Gee Studio
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)