Chris Williamson offers advice on how to make sure you don't confuse Census Bureau projections with actual planning.
"Last September, the Census Bureau released its American Community Survey estimates for cities, counties, and census-designated places with populations over 65,000. Most notable was the ACS's published margin of error, which allows the data user to construct the low-to-high error range of the estimate.
Technically, any number within the range is correct, but the popular press had a field day with that definition of "correct." Reporters found cities where the low end of the error range was below the city's current population and the high end of the range showed a dramatic increase.
...Keep in mind that a projection is a conditional statement about the future based on a set of assumptions. A projection is basically math run on a set of data and assumptions. In applied demography, the beginning year census data and math are seldom wrong. The real art is in choosing assumptions, which are often implied future planning decisions.
...Finally, think ahead. If communities create entitlements to accommodate projection-based growth for 10 or 20 years into the future, that growth is likely to occur. In other words, growth will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Isn't it irresponsible to ignore projections in planning? Yes, it is. What is the alternative? The alternative is old-fashioned planning that takes projections into account, but is not driven by projections. Suppose planners asked these questions: Can we have our vision in the context of these population projections? What will happen if we try? How much and what kind of projected demand should we accommodate to keep our economy healthy and to house our own children?
That is a very different paradigm from this one: "We must plan to accommodate [number] housing units over [years] based on the [source] projection."
Chris Williamson, AICP, is a senior planner in Oxnard, California, and adjunct associate professor of planning and GIS at the University of Southern California. He also teaches Planetizen's PLAN-120: Introduction to Census Data, ACS, and Growth course.
Read the full story: Is That a Good Assumption?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
'This is going to be painful:’ Virginia stares down $1.7 billion funding gap for highway maintenance
The state may address the deficit by shifting $290 million from its construction budget to maintenance projects.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
KFH Group Inc.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello