A new analysis of the relocation patterns of households that participate in FEMA’s flood buyout program reveals a pattern of increased racial segregation.

New research into what happens to homeowners who participate in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) buyout program for flood-prone properties indicates that the program, while it encourages managed retreat in the face of rising sea levels and increased flood risks, “program outcomes look very different depending on the racial makeup of a given neighborhood.”
“The first difference is in who takes buyouts in the first place,” Jake Bittle explains in Grist. “The average majority-white buyout area had an almost 90 percent chance of flooding by 2050, compared to as low as around 50 percent for majority-Black buyout areas. This suggests that white households only participate in the program when the flood risk around them is severe, and otherwise tend to stay put.” This could be due in part to better investment in flood mitigation infrastructure in richer areas or a better chance of selling homes through the private market rather than opting for a FEMA buyout.
Another finding reveals that households from white-majority neighborhoods are more likely to move to other white-majority areas after a buyout. Jim Elliott, lead author of the study, “believes the data shows white families in all neighborhoods using buyout money to move to wealthier and whiter areas.”
The study concludes that “FEMA money seems to grease the wheels of pre-existing processes of white flight and urban segregation, allowing white households to leave behind diversifying neighborhoods and entrench themselves in other white suburbs and towns.”
Elliott suggests the buyout program should provide additional support for low-income households so they can access a wider variety of housing in their new neighborhoods and keep a more detailed record of how the program affects participating households.
FULL STORY: FEMA’s buyout program reduces flood risk. But does it deepen segregation?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)