With 27 transit agencies, traveling across the Bay Area can be a daunting task. Advocates for 'seamless transit' want to change that.
A blog post from TransitCenter explains the San Francisco Bay Area's complicated transit system, which boasts 27 different agencies across nine counties.
The introduction of the Clipper Card in 2002 was intended to help. For the first time, riders could use the same payment card for rides across the region. But the technology alone wasn’t enough to solve the problem. To this day, riders whose trips require them to use multiple agencies still face a penalty – interagency transfers are only sparingly accepted, and most agencies don’t coordinate their schedules, creating long waits between transfers.
Thanks in part to advocacy from a group calling itself Seamless Bay Area, a proposed state bill dubbed the "Seamless Transit Transformation Act" would mandate an integrated fare structure by 2024 and require transit agencies to coordinate schedules, service, and maps in order to receive state funding. "With the Bay Area’s infamous housing costs continuing to push people further from employment centers and ridership slow to recover from the pandemic, the initiative could be the key to bringing back riders, and making transit a viable option for tens of thousands more people," the blog states.
"There have been various attempts at fare integration over the last several decades, but the efforts haven’t been resourced or coordinated enough to be successful." To find out why, "According to [Seamless’s Advocacy Director, Adina Levin], Seamless looked at where previous integration efforts had fallen short, and brought in equity-focused groups and elected officials to the task force process and accompanying outreach in order to increase the likelihood of success." The organization has focused on developing a plan to integrate the dozens of agencies under one umbrella, with questions of logistics and revenue share still to be decided.
Read the full story: Towards a Seamless Bay Area
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
In Texas, data centers are swallowing promised parkland
Residents who moved to Taylor, Texas for a rural community now have to contend with three data centers in their backyard.
How a Chicago-sized wind farm beat the odds and powered on
The project spanned five presidential administrations and a standoff with a U.S. military base.
MTA gives itself 30 days to transform pit into basketball court
The site has been under construction since 2022; the city originally estimated it would finish the court in 2024.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority