Another fatal crash prompts questions about Elon Musk's autopilot claims.

A recent fatal crash outside of Houston highlights the dangers of relying on Tesla's Full Self-Driving Capability, the $10,000 feature that "includes Autopilot, a feature that 'automatically' drives on highways, changing lanes, keeping a car within its lane and at a consistent distance from other vehicles."
Despite the name, Tesla warns against using the features without proper supervision in company materials, writes Aarian Marshall in Wired. "Lengthy blocks of text in Tesla owners’ manuals describe when, where, and how the features should be used: by a fully attentive driver who is holding the steering wheel and is 'mindful of road conditions and surrounding traffic.' That driver shouldn’t be near city streets, construction zones, bicyclists, or pedestrians, the manual says."
The two men died "when their 2019 Model S reportedly slammed into a tree and caught fire," possibly with no driver at the wheel. "Harris County constable Mark Herman said that while local authorities’ preliminary investigation is not complete, they believe no one was behind the wheel of the vehicle when it crashed." The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board are both investigating the incident. "A spokesperson for NHTSA says the agency has opened investigations into 28 Tesla-related crash incidents."
Despite Tesla CEO Elon Musk's claim that "Autopilot's getting good enough that you won't need to drive most of the time unless you really want to" and his unfulfilled 2019 assertion that his company would operate one million robotaxis by the end of 2020, the company told the California Department of Motor Vehicles that "Full Self-Driving will 'remain largely unchanged in the future,' and that FSD will remain an 'advanced driver-assistance feature' rather than an autonomous one."
FULL STORY: A Fatal Crash Renews Concerns Over Tesla’s ‘Autopilot’ Claim

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions