Knowing is half the battle, and most people have a lot to learn about metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and how they maintain the status quo of transportation planning and spending in the United States.
With over 400 MPOs in the United States, why have so few Americans interacted with, or understand, these organizations, even as this lack of understanding contributes to a status quo that is draining governments of money and locking in the car-centric status quo.
A blog post by Sam Sklar attempts the impossible (we kid): to explain metropolitan planning organizations, even making it sound simple:
Chances are you’ve never had a meaningful interaction with your regional transportation planning body, sometimes known as an MPO—Metropolitan Planning Organization. This organization, required by law for regions over 50,000 people, does two things: creates and maintains a long range plan (LRP) and the capital spending program that feeds into the statewide program—the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) superhighway.
The article provides a brief history of MPOs—even with 400 MPOs in the country, none of them have been around for that long, and the first was created in 1960. But in that time, MPOs have had an underappreciated effect on the practice of planning. Or, as Sklar puts it: "The formalization of MPOs in the early 1970s into replicable agencies exploded the rationality of planning and appropriating the future of highway dollars, now coming in the billions annually."
But the planning choices of MPOs led to freeway revolts and Sklar notes some fundamental discrepancies and conflicts with the way MPOs function, and the results they deliver.
With the many challenges of regional transportation and land use planning governance in mind, Sklar also presents a series of policy prescriptions to hold MPOS accountable for their decisions and to better deliver projects that meet the actual needs of the community. Underlying these prescriptions is an acknowledgement that large transportation projects should refocus their efforts to fixing existing infrastructure first, before expanding the capacity of the system.
Read the full story: I'm sorry, I don't speak MPO.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority