Research reveals that shared bikes and scooters are often a crucial lifeline for low-income workers, signaling a need to include micromobility in the larger public transit conversation.

A study of survey data from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand sheds light on how low-income people use shared micromobility services, indicating an opportunity for cities to improve transportation services for the workers who need them most.
Kea Wilson outlines the findings in Streetsblog USA, writing, “Participants in the Lime Access program, which grants discounts of around ‘70 or 80 percent’ to riders who qualify, were significantly more likely to list essential reasons like ‘shopping’ for groceries (35 percent) and ‘commuting’ (31 percent) than non-Access riders, 11 and 21 percent of whom rode to complete errands or go to work, respectively.”
The study found that lower-income users were very unlikely to use shared mobility for non-essential reasons. “And a whopping 44 percent of their trips connected to a traditional transit ride, compared to just 23 percent of people who paid full price.”
As Wilson notes, “Perhaps the most surprising findings, though, were riders' qualitative responses about what micromobility meant to them, and how their lives were made better by having access to affordable ways to get around without a car.” According to Calvin Thigpen, director of policy research for Lime and co-author of the report, “People are using this to get around for pivotal trips; they are heavy, often daily users.”
However, most U.S. bike share systems are not subsidized by public funding, meaning any equity programs cut into the operators’ profit margins. Planetizen recently covered Houston BCycle’s decision to shut down that program due to funding problems. For Thigpen and other advocates, this signals a need to support and fund shared mobility programs as an integral component of an accessible, comprehensive public transit system.
FULL STORY: Study: How Low-Income People Really Use Micromobility

Planetizen’s Top Planning Books of 2023
The world is changing, and planning with it.

Chicago Red Line Extension Could Transform the South Side
The city’s transit agency is undertaking its biggest expansion ever to finally bring rail to the South Side.

How ‘Daylighting’ Intersections Can Save Lives
Eliminating visual obstructions can make intersections safer for all users.

Green Spaces Benefit Neighborhoods—When Residents can Reach Them
A study comparing green space and walkability scores found that, without effective access to local parks, residents of greener neighborhoods don’t reap the health benefits.

Eugene Ends Parking Minimums
In a move that complies with a state law aimed at reducing transportation emissions, Eugene amended its parking rules to eliminate minimum requirements and set maximum parking lot sizes.

Chicago Announces ‘Better Streets for Buses’ Plan
The plan establishes a ‘toolkit’ of improvements to make the bus riding experience more reliable, comfortable, and accessible.
Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Morganton
San Joaquin County
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
Park City Municipal Corporation
National Capital Planning Commission
City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.