The built environment in one of the most affluent places in the country leaves much to be desired. Why are Silicon Valley communities missing so many key urban features?

Picture Silicon Valley and you might imagine “techies doing cool tech things on every sidewalk, in every restaurant and juice bar, in every garage and loft, on every bus, train, scooter, and hoverboard.” But that’s far from the reality, writes Josh Stephens in Common Edge.
The real Silicon Valley is so dull, it makes you want to climb atop the nearest standing desk and hurl yourself off headfirst. It makes you want to put on VR goggles and never take them off.
For Stephens, Santa Clara, arguably the center of Silicon Valley, is “somehow, even more bleak” than its endless office parks, strip malls, and mid-density apartment complexes would imply. With an average home price of $1.5 million and rents at over $3,000 per month, Santa Clara is an unusual yet “ordinary example of 20th century urbanism.” A bigger question might be, “is Santa Clara’s bleakness a feature or a bug? Why do all of those wealthy people and wealthy companies want to live with all of that ugliness?”
The wealth in Santa Clara, unlike more ostentatious enclaves like, say, Beverly Hills, is hidden, Stephens writes, in part because if it was more apparent, maybe people would demand a more livable, affordable community. “Meanwhile, all over the Bay Area, young professionals sleep on sofas; public-sector workers commute in from beyond the horizon; people reside in boxes up in the Tenderloin; and low-income workers without cars live extralegally wherever they can.”
Stephens asserts that Santa Clara “warrants scrutiny for all that it has squandered,” using none of its immense wealth to create anything close to a vibrant city. “If the city harnessed even a fraction of the capital sloshing around its city limits, it could transform itself into a model of equity, sustainability, and creativity.”
Stephens concludes that “Santa Clara’s underperformance is not a moral failing exactly. Cities rise and fall collectively.” Santa Clara may offer a high-profile example of our failures, but it’s nevertheless part of a collective failure.
FULL STORY: Is Santa Clara—the Heart of Silicon Valley—Soulless and Banal by Intent?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)