As Oregon's coastal beaches erode, taking valued public space with them and exposing private property to increased risks from flooding and sea-level rise, some local governments want to allow property owners the right to "armor" the coast.

After decades of enforcing a state law banning construction of rip-rap, or a barrier constructed of large rocks, along the coastline, Tillamook County, Oregon has decided to toss the state law and allow coastal homeowners to reinforce the coastline to protect their homes, according to an article by Kristian Foden-Vencil for OPB.
"Oregon land-use rules largely ban shoreline armoring, under what’s known as Goal 18," explains Foden-Vencil in the article. "The policy, adopted back in 1977, banned the use of rip rap to protect new development, unless the site qualified for an exception."
Goal 18 was adopted to protect the natural features of the Oregon Coast, but scientists have also shown that rip rap "changes the wave action on a beach, scouring away sand and potentially leaving no beach for the public to enjoy," according to the article.
"So there’s a natural friction between the hundreds of thousands of Oregonians who live on the coast and want their properties protected from the ocean, and environmentalists and visitors who vacation here and want to protect the beautiful vistas."
As reported in the source article below, Tillamook County, located on the Oregon Coast directly west of Portland but south of the mouth of the Columbia River, has recently begun to favor rip rap over public beaches.
But environmentalists aren't allowing the shift in land use policy without a legal fight. "The Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition is fighting Tillamook County’s decision and taking the Pine Beach case to Oregon’s Land Use Board of Appeals, or LUBA. They’re joined in their case by the Surfrider Foundation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development," reports Foden -Vencil.
FULL STORY: Oregon’s land-use rules bump up against increasingly crowded shorelines

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions