The practice of limiting high-density development to busy arterial streets puts renters and low-income households at higher risk for the effects of air and noise pollution created on major roads.
Henry Grabar argues that policies that encourage higher-density development only on busy streets and commercial corridors amounts to discrimination against renters that perpetuates inequality. As Grabar puts it,
Unfortunately, big streets are not nice places to live. Their traffic is noisy, dirty, and dangerous. Allowing apartment buildings to be built at all is progress, but ensuring they rise only in the worst locations is not fair to the people who live in them.
The practice elicits less resistance from neighborhood groups that want to maintain single-family zoning, notes Grabar, "[b]ut that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea." While it's logical to build housing near transit, side streets in the same areas could also be upzoned to accommodate more housing. "Many critics have rightly pointed out, in recent years, that zoning in residential neighborhoods seems a lot more concerned with types of neighbors than with the supposedly hazardous consequences of their arrival." Meanwhile, planners concerned about additional traffic from high-rise buildings naturally lean toward placing them on busier roads, compounding the problem.
In an October article, Daniel Oleksiuk made a similar argument, calling for Vancouver to stop relegating multi-family dwellings to busy arterials and effectively turning renters into a 'buffer' for the pollution caused by crowded urban streets. According to Oleksiuk, while some people may choose to live on busy thoroughfares for the convenience, renter households should not be forced to suffer the brunt of urban pollution and public health hazards.
FULL STORY: Upzone the Side Streets!
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
How Freeway Projects Impact Climate Resilience
In addition to displacement and public health impacts, highway expansions can also make communities less resilient to flooding and other climate-related disasters.
California Grid Runs on 100% Renewable Energy for Over 9 Hours
The state’s energy grid was entirely powered by clean energy for some portion of the day on 37 out of the last 45 days.
New Forecasting Tool Aims to Reduce Heat-Related Deaths
Two federal agencies launched a new, easy-to-use, color-coded heat warning system that combines meteorological and medical risk factors.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.