In the wake of multiple fatal crashes involving Tesla's self-driving mode, ethicists suggest the need for a robust set of regulations governing the testing of AVs before more of them hit the road.
Tesla, which "has been offering customers access to a 'Full Self Driving' beta software, allowing Tesla owners to effectively become guinea pigs for the company's tech" for years, "is now under investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for several crashes where the Autopilot system was engaged." James McCandless reports on new research "that explores the intersection of human behavior and automated driving features in production and future vehicles."
According to Dr. Bryan Reimer, research scientist at the MIT Center for Transportation, "the push towards autonomous driving is a balancing act between what autonomous vehicles can do versus what a driver is capable of doing in conjunction with that technology. The goal is to take some of the more routine driving tasks out of the hands of the driver." Because humans, by nature, tend to become over-reliant on automation, "Reimer says that autonomous systems should be seen as a collaborative part of driving in helping drivers make moment-to-moment decisions." But drivers using Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self Driving modes "have become less attentive on average," leading to the multiple crashes seen in the last year. To Reimer, these repeated incidents raise ethical questions about the efficacy of 'self-driving' modes. "Once we understand a situation," he says, "it becomes foreseeable misuse." Reimer suggests a more cautious approach to autonomous testing and a need for "third-party validated scientific data."
"[T]he uneven nature of autonomous vehicle testing is partly down to the absence of a relevant regulatory environment." According to Reimer and Dr. Nicholas Evans, professor of philosophy at University of Massachusetts-Lowell, autonomous cars need "a regulatory body similar to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that can oversee the development of these technologies and insure that they're being safely tested and used."
The benefits of increased oversight, says Evans, "outweigh any reductions of speed in testing cycles," and "there should be more dialogue about the ethical implications of who is affected by more self-driving vehicles on the road and the unintended consequences."
The Right to Mobility
As we consider how to decarbonize transportation, preserving mobility, especially for lower- and middle-income people, must be a priority.
Bend Eliminates Parking Minimums
The city is complying with an Oregon state mandate that some cities have challenged in court.
Scottsdale Cuts Water Supply to Nearby Suburb
The city claims it has no responsibility to provide water to the unincorporated Maricopa County community.
Utah Could Eliminate Parking Requirements Near Transit
A proposed state bill would bar cities from requiring parking in areas adjacent to transit stations in an effort to make housing production more affordable and encourage walking and transit use.
Where Pandemic Bike Improvements Won Out
While some cities are reverting back to pre-pandemic street configurations, others are taking advantage of the momentum for bike and pedestrian infrastructure to make pandemic-era projects permanent.
Atlanta Transit Plans Stall Due to Budget Concerns
With MARTA facing a potential billion dollar shortfall, the agency says it can’t fulfill its system expansion plan.
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Harvard GSD Executive Education
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.