The pandemic let many people experience a commute-free lifestyle, but can we reduce rush-hour traffic as we make our return to physical workplaces?
"Every recent survey reports that the rush-hour commute is, to most of the drivers who endure it, the most difficult and unpleasant part of their day," writes Alan Ehrenhalt. "It is also the most alienating." Yet "[i]t shouldn’t be forgotten that the solo commute is a creation of the 20th century. In Victorian times, work and home life were concentrated in the same places." In fact, "[t]he nightmares of rush hour were and are creatures of the automobile, the modern suburb and the zoning ordinances that have rigidly separated commercial and industrial enclaves from the residential districts of metro areas."
During the pandemic, travel patterns shifted significantly. "Drivers, especially those working at home, have been spacing out their travel much more evenly over the course of the day," flattening the rush hour traffic peaks. "Is there a way we can buck the historical trend of eventual return to congestion and keep something like the current arrangement going?"
In lieu of a scenario where a significant percentage of workers keep working from home(a possibility that carries its own rippling implications), Ehrenhalt argues that a simple solution to the commute problem "would be to bring most remote workers back to the center city but to stagger their hours, as has been happening to a limited extent already." Our "nightmare rush hours" are a result of "inefficient management practices — we could wake up from the nightmare with a commitment to sensible scheduling."
Of course, writes Ehrenhalt, "the most appealing long-term answer is for more of us to live near the places where we work," reducing the need for extensive travel to and from work. The commuting problem can only be solved by eliminating the need for it for more people.
Read the full story: Is There an Exit Ramp from the Rush-Hour Nightmare?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority