Learn today, plan for tomorrow.
Sign up for news and offers from Planetizen Courses, the online learning platform for planners.
L.A. Planners Working to Shift Affordable Housing Distribution for More Equitable Results
Almost all the affordable housing development in L.A. in the past decade has occurred in majority-minority neighborhoods. The L.A. Department of City Planning is looking for ways to make sure high-income areas do more of their fair share.
The Los Angeles Department of City Planning (DCP) is hoping to leverage the eight-year Regional Housing Allocation (RHNA) process to ensure that affordable housing development and growth are distributed equitably across its neighborhoods.
According to an article by Steven Sharp, DCP staff co-authored a new report with the city's Housing and Community Investment Department to document the inequities of affordable housing development in L.A. over the past decade. The report also suggests short- and long-term policies designed to shift the distribution of affordable housing to more affluent parts of the city.
According to Sharp's summary of the report's finding, "over the past decade, affordable housing has been increasingly concentrated in majority-minority neighborhoods in Central and South Los Angeles, which have long been characterized by poverty and segregation." Specifically, "Just 14 percent of the city's affordable units over that time period - nearly 1,600 in total - were built in high-resource communities, compared to 62 percent in low-resource neighborhoods."
The report also blames zoning for contributing to that divide. "In high resource communities, 76 percent of residential parcels are zoned for single-family uses, with 20 percent set aside for apartments," explains Sharp. " In low resource neighborhoods, the ratio is flipped, with 80 percent of residential land zoned for apartments and just 20 reserved for single-family homes."
The policy recommendations in the report include zoning changes that target high-opportunity communities proximate to transit routes. "Additionally, the report proposes more flexible zoning and new incentives to promote the construction of so-called 'missing middle' housing in current single-family and low-density neighborhoods," reports Sharp. Also included in the report's policy recommendations: the idea of a citywide inclusionary zoning policy.
More details and recommendations are included in the source article linked below.
Published on Tuesday, June 8, 2021 in
Topics
- The 5 Worst Streets in Seattle
- Census: 7 Million Americans Are Behind on Rent
- The Pretext Problem: The Pitfalls of Planning While Bargaining
- Inglewood Set to Rezone Neighborhoods Near New Transit Lines
- Answers to 12 Questions About California Assembly Bill 1401
- 15 of the 'Worst Highways in America'
- A Game-Changing Bike and Pedestrian Bridge Opens in Portland
- Miami Residents Resist the Idea of a 20-Foot Seawall
- U.S. Home Construction Costs Are Higher Than Ever
- Strong Demand in the First Month of Chicago's Coach House Pilot Program
- Lawsuit by Malibu Wineries Challenges Ban on New Vineyards
- Mapping Environmental Justice Hotspots
- How the Built Environment Impacts Public Health
- Miami Funds Protected Bike Lanes With E-Scooter Fees
- A New Transit Equity Dashboard
- The Big Taboo of the Senate's Bipartisan Infrastructure Proposal
- New Building Heights Coming to East Austin
- Now Nashville Plans to Tackle its Housing Affordability Challenges
- Reducing Car Trips in L.A.: Transportation Demand Management Ordinance Could Be Expanded
- Report: The Pandemic Tells a Tale of Two Housing Markets
