A critical question arises in response to an affordable housing project proposed in Phoenix: When measuring a project's affordability, does the larger county's median income matter when some neighborhoods are struggling well beyond that measure?

"A developer plans to build 161 mixed-income apartments and 64 townhomes in south Phoenix where residents can work toward ownership, but critics say say [sic] the homes aren't affordable enough," reports Megan Taros.
Here's how the affordability of the proposed development breaks down in context of Phoenix's economic conditions:
The project, by Chicanos por la Causa, has promised that 10 of the units will go to residents earning 30% to 60% of Maricopa County's median income of $77,800 for a single family.
Eligible renters are capped at 60% of this area median income, making it 100% affordable according to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development standards.
But many residents in the neighborhood make far less than the project's asking prices. The average median income for residents in the 85040 ZIP code, where the project is proposed, is less than $39,000 a year, according to American Community Survey data cited in the article.
With light rail expected to arrive in the neighborhood by 2024, local activists are predicting that the project is a sign of gentrification to come. "SoPho Convening, a community organization dedicated to equitable economic development, and residents asked the Phoenix City Council in July to delay approval to allow Chicanos por la Causa to work with stakeholders in the project," according to Taros.
The project has achieved mixed success during the planning approvals process. The South Mountain Village Planning Committee voted to reject the project, but the Phoenix Planning Commission voted to approve.
FULL STORY: Affordable housing coming to south Phoenix, but residents say it’s not affordable enough

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)