It's not clear if President Trump is aware that his administration has been working to rescind the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule since 2018, but he's recently doubled down on messaging that pit suburbs against the Fair Housing Act.
"With President Trump facing sagging support in the suburbs, his administration on Thursday targeted an Obama-era affordable housing regulation, the latest in a series of appeals to white voters’ fears of crime and declining property values," report Chris Megerian, Liam Dillon, and Eli Stokols for the Los Angeles Times.
"The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced that it would scrap a regulation known as Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing," marking a final escalation to threats made by the Trump administration since the election to roll back the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule, approved by the Obama administration to strengthen the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
"The new regulation from the Trump administration would allow local governments much broader latitude in deciding if their policies were racially discriminatory," according to the article.
The Los Angeles Times coverage includes discussion of the political context for the announcement, which includes previous criticisms of the president's recent statement and action on the AFFH as a straw man intended to sow division and marshal voter support ahead of the November election.
Meanwhile, reactions to the Trump administration's actions against the AFFH have drawn mixed results even from conservative audiences. Stanley Kurtz, whose June article in the National Review inspired this sudden spate of interest from the Trump administration, spoke glowingly of the decision in a new article for the same publication. Writing for The Week, Bonnie Kristian, pushed back on the fear mongering inherent in Trump's recent threats about the impending Democratic threat to the suburbs, making the case that the suburbs are actually a symbol of exactly the kind of government intervention conservatives are supposed to oppose. Charles Marohn made a similar argument recently, regarding the exclusionary zoning practices which serves as the regulatory backbone of almost every community in the country.
Read the full story: Trump repeals rule meant to integrate neighborhoods, further stoking racial divisions in campaign
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority